From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: <cristian.marussi@arm.com>, <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>, <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Chandra Sekhar Lingutla <quic_lingutla@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fixup perf microwatt support
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 21:43:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cfd73bb-3ae6-d7bd-296c-0c39d194464b@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814092503.xdzafmqu5h3shrlz@bogus>
Hey Sudeep,
On 8/14/23 14:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 02:18:18AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> The perf power scale value would currently be reported as bogowatts if the
>> platform firmware supports microwatt power scale and meets the perf major
>> version requirements. Fix this by populating version information in the
>> driver private data before the call to protocol attributes is made.
>>
>> CC: Chandra Sekhar Lingutla <quic_lingutla@quicinc.com>
>> Fixes: 3630cd8130ce ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.1 perf power-cost in microwatts")
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
>> index c0cd556fbaae..30dedd6ebfde 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
>> @@ -1080,6 +1080,8 @@ static int scmi_perf_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
>
> Please rebase any patch when posting upstream on upstream kernel tree.
> This definitely looks like some downstream tree. I will adjust and apply
> this time. This file never crossed 1000 line and this patch indicates
> otherwise, so I am sure Qcom has some downstream changes in this file now.
Thanks for taking time to review the patch but zero points for the ^^
deduction lol. The correct phrasing would be v6.5 rc6 hasn't crossed 1k
lines but the patch was based on next-20230809 which has the perf level
indexing mode support in addition :)
- Sibi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-11 20:48 Sibi Sankar
2023-08-14 7:54 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-08-14 9:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-08-14 16:13 ` Sibi Sankar [this message]
2023-08-15 8:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-09-20 13:42 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0cfd73bb-3ae6-d7bd-296c-0c39d194464b@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=quic_lingutla@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_rjendra@quicinc.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®