From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org
Cc: ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
qi.zheng@linux.dev, jack@suse.cz, pfalcato@suse.de,
ayushr@modal.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: memory: fix truncation removing mapped folios
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 18:12:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d2a1809fa1cfc22ad3df26ec28b2d30e5cdf3bd.1791540483.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
Ayush reported an issue that shmem/tmpfs folios are still mapped when
truncating them on production:
"
BUG: Bad page cache in process ... pfn:...
page dumped because: still mapped when deleted
"
I reproduced the issue with Ayush's reproducer [1] with the latest mm-unstable
branch, and I got the following crash info. From the dump message, we can
see that truncate_inode_folio() is really trying to remove mapped folios,
which is incorrect.
"
[ 189.171977] page: refcount:3 mapcount:1 mapping:00000000fe168ee1
index:0x3880 pfn:0x191647
[ 189.171995] memcg:ffff0000cc073d40
[ 189.171997] aops:shmem_aops ino:3c01 dentry name(?):"memfd:runsc-memory"
[ 189.172006] flags: 0x17fffef0002022d(locked|referenced|uptodate|lru|
workingset|swapbacked|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x3ffff)
.......
[ 189.172017] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_mapped(folio))
[ 189.172026] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 189.172027] kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:155!
[ 189.172057] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
.......
[ 189.177721] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 5521 Comm: repro Kdump: loaded Tainted:
7.3.0-rc4+ #277 PREEMPT(lazy)
.......
[ 189.183986] Call trace:
[ 189.184124] filemap_unaccount_folio+0xf0/0x1e8 (P)
[ 189.184391] __filemap_remove_folio+0x34/0x160
[ 189.184633] filemap_remove_folio+0x4c/0xb0
[ 189.184859] truncate_inode_folio+0x34/0x58
[ 189.185087] shmem_undo_range+0x220/0x658
[ 189.185308] shmem_fallocate+0x2f0/0x470
[ 189.185527] vfs_fallocate+0x128/0x328
......
[ 189.187078] el0t_64_sync+0x184/0x188
"
After analysis, I believe the race exists between truncation and MADV_DONTNEED,
and shmem's ->map_pages() merely makes the issue easier to reproduce. Since
MADV_DONTNEED synchronously releases the pagetable page before calling
tlb_flush_rmaps(), this could cause another thread's truncation to skip
zap_pte_range() (due to pmd is none) but still observe the folio's mapcount
as non-zero. A possible race scenario is as follows:
CPU 0 CPU 1
shmem_fallocate madvise_dontneed_single_vma
unmap_mapping_range .......
......
(filemap_map_pages() remap folios)
zap_pte_range
truncate_inode_folio zap_empty_pte_table(pmd clear)
unmap_mapping_folio
......
zap_pmd_range (saw pmd none, skip)
filemap_remove_folio
BUG_ON(folio_mapped)
tlb_flush_rmaps(remove rmaps)
To fix this issue, we should move the pmd clear operation (via zap_empty_pte_table())
to after tlb_flush_rmaps() and add a smp_wmb() memory barrier, so that when
we find a pmd_none() while unmapping a folio without holding the PTL, the
folio's mappings are guaranteed to have been removed via tlb_flush_rmaps().
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260925065013.3682431-1-ayushr@modal.com/
Reported-by: Ayush Ranjan <ayushr@modal.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260924061708.1645968-1-ayushr@modal.com/
Fixes: 6375e95f381e ("mm: pgtable: reclaim empty PTE page in madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)")
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 1f5d5f7d39cd..0272217ad7b0 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2036,6 +2036,15 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
}
} while (pte += nr, addr += PAGE_SIZE * nr, addr != end);
+ add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss);
+ lazy_mmu_mode_disable();
+
+ /* Do the actual TLB flush before dropping ptl */
+ if (force_flush) {
+ tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
+ tlb_flush_rmaps(tlb, vma);
+ }
+
/*
* Fast path: try to hold the pmd lock and unmap the PTE page.
*
@@ -2044,16 +2053,10 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
* to ensure they are still none, thereby preventing the pte entries
* from being repopulated by another thread.
*/
- if (can_reclaim_pt && direct_reclaim && addr == end)
+ if (can_reclaim_pt && direct_reclaim && addr == end) {
+ /* rmap changes need to be observed before e.g PTEs get zapped. */
+ smp_wmb();
direct_reclaim = zap_empty_pte_table(mm, pmd, ptl, &pmdval);
-
- add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss);
- lazy_mmu_mode_disable();
-
- /* Do the actual TLB flush before dropping ptl */
- if (force_flush) {
- tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
- tlb_flush_rmaps(tlb, vma);
}
pte_unmap_unlock(start_pte, ptl);
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 10:12 Baolin Wang [this message]
2026-10-09 12:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-09 13:36 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-10-09 13:53 ` Baolin Wang
2026-10-09 17:01 ` Pedro Falcato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d2a1809fa1cfc22ad3df26ec28b2d30e5cdf3bd.1791540483.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ayushr@modal.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®