mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: wharms@bfs.de
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] can: kvaser_pciefd: remove redundant negative check on trigger
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:41:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d61d4a1-4307-af0e-5dae-517dea89c992@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5D39A274.1000800@bfs.de>

On 25/07/2019 13:37, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 25.07.2019 13:25, schrieb Colin King:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> The check to see if trigger is less than zero is always false, trigger
>> is always in the range 0..255.  Hence the check is redundant and can
>> be removed.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c | 3 ---
>>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
>> index 3af747cbbde4..68e00aad0810 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/kvaser_pciefd.c
>> @@ -652,9 +652,6 @@ static void kvaser_pciefd_pwm_stop(struct kvaser_pciefd_can *can)
>>  	top = (pwm_ctrl >> KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_TOP_SHIFT) & 0xff;
>>  
>>  	trigger = (100 * top + 50) / 100;
>> -	if (trigger < 0)
>> -		trigger = 0;
>> -
> 	to be fair i do not understand the calculation here here.
> 	(100*top+50)/100 = top+50/100
> 
> 	but seems to be int so it should be =top

Indeed it does not do anything, that does look like an unintentional
bug. Good catch.

> 
> 	did i missunderstand something here ?
> 
> 	re,
> 	 wh
> 
> 
>>  	pwm_ctrl = trigger & 0xff;
>>  	pwm_ctrl |= (top & 0xff) << KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_TOP_SHIFT;
>>  	iowrite32(pwm_ctrl, can->reg_base + KVASER_PCIEFD_KCAN_PWM_REG);


      reply	other threads:[~2019-07-25 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-25 11:25 Colin King
2019-07-25 12:37 ` walter harms
2019-07-25 12:41   ` Colin Ian King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0d61d4a1-4307-af0e-5dae-517dea89c992@canonical.com \
    --to=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    --cc=wharms@bfs.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®