From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30FBF2D8DBB; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790242586; cv=none; b=lIVwrLmf6BIqahlrtEVTj1h0MN35q5qXdlV8RX0Em17wKgW+/4WtqPRqShHzKTjohgZFidTqBRBHgnvG0DQbzJhLOXBruYfcKKKdfPyGh9M7t7JE/laCU72rEhJCHFkIdYQkDe+PW6qMDpZo+2kI6PSO1kfYm8LV4uBjHMov0Y4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790242586; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i3pt1H9qNRC/nyv8uVo4NsVAFMXIpMQd9zhfUIBZLK8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ssksYsnKST1BZE5mjMvolPGt1kUADDs4UN7Wht0uGhvdvwr3/3YjfP0f6XubOnJICBDtEB5DeDygERe9vYBX1neYj5er6juHQtyPGcQteLIFs4GQr1+yM/fh8vxkZul3l3nnqey9wOLIlqH0ctPXweM9VJbIEnMC6n2jKBc2B4Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i62KZs0V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i62KZs0V" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50C551F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:36:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790242584; bh=ZiYfP3OJ/9LAMpeByACJ22Dt1rNk0pU/miAnrdFKvlc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=i62KZs0VBwe+7WBncDD2NIaGeytnxoCGW4Vafmq0m9+p38DyxbtEY9F5+z7w8RKUI at2jPMAUdLGsOUedUT/Qs/GhkYLvX5xwWmLR4E093NhOY2B5AsPmLMTIYd0n1b3eLE jhIHPNz/x+Rp64R6tyhnplcsec22FnQ4SrGhtQLsrwH0+Cm/NeU3z9pg0VBt9ToLhj Q7Zrc9xaStAscYiuWDpsqw2oUJ1Li0YUXbw7+rGS3g7rIksABijDxpbfG4K9ZwVYCC Z7i6jmG/FLBm6CXdF95+gRQYlDQL6tw6t5Wz5xcqudIbdlZZ1BYUfP78+H/98o7l4l QLY5FdGww5brQ== Message-ID: <0d798541-6486-44ff-ae57-f631d1465688@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:36:19 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfs: Fix missing alloc tagging of direct mempool allocations Content-Language: en-US To: Hao Ge , David Howells , Paulo Alcantara , Harry Yoo , Andrew Morton , Hao Li , Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Roman Gushchin , "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" , Suren Baghdasaryan , Christoph Hellwig Cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Erhard Furtner , stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20260923063759.34667-1-hao.ge@linux.dev> From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" Autocrypt: addr=vbabka@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFZdmxYBEADsw/SiUSjB0dM+vSh95UkgcHjzEVBlby/Fg+g42O7LAEkCYXi/vvq31JTB KxRWDHX0R2tgpFDXHnzZcQywawu8eSq0LxzxFNYMvtB7sV1pxYwej2qx9B75qW2plBs+7+YB 87tMFA+u+L4Z5xAzIimfLD5EKC56kJ1CsXlM8S/LHcmdD9Ctkn3trYDNnat0eoAcfPIP2OZ+ 9oe9IF/R28zmh0ifLXyJQQz5ofdj4bPf8ecEW0rhcqHfTD8k4yK0xxt3xW+6Exqp9n9bydiy tcSAw/TahjW6yrA+6JhSBv1v2tIm+itQc073zjSX8OFL51qQVzRFr7H2UQG33lw2QrvHRXqD Ot7ViKam7v0Ho9wEWiQOOZlHItOOXFphWb2yq3nzrKe45oWoSgkxKb97MVsQ+q2SYjJRBBH4 8qKhphADYxkIP6yut/eaj9ImvRUZZRi0DTc8xfnvHGTjKbJzC2xpFcY0DQbZzuwsIZ8OPJCc LM4S7mT25NE5kUTG/TKQCk922vRdGVMoLA7dIQrgXnRXtyT61sg8PG4wcfOnuWf8577aXP1x 6mzw3/jh3F+oSBHb/GcLC7mvWreJifUL2gEdssGfXhGWBo6zLS3qhgtwjay0Jl+kza1lo+Cv BB2T79D4WGdDuVa4eOrQ02TxqGN7G0Biz5ZLRSFzQSQwLn8fbwARAQABzSNWbGFzdGltaWwg QmFia2EgPHZiYWJrYUBrZXJuZWwub3JnPsLBsAQTAQoAWhYhBKlA1DSZLC6OmRA9UCJPp+fM gqZkBQJqFFy6GxSAAAAAAAQADm1hbnUyLDIuNSsxLjEyLDIsMgIbAwUJGtCBUAULCQgHAwUV CgkICwUWAgMBAAIeBQIXgAAKCRAiT6fnzIKmZJIUEADFx/tREzUImHrEwVHeSvDFmA7tJysI UVrlvrM09E7GIuzphzv7jYmo8n3ANpCczLEVr4G0syYQdTigaZgv3+FQDIIzhKih1IHhu1Ei XHlywNWKnQxxQEUNi5Mwx43wQz5XVw9F1A7gtKBKNtfogO511hAbrzagrYajyQacEJ/+sfhZ 9Da8ltHIXD8pcYaHUfQgEusCgmEd9+KrUwrTbckFKmYq5chuE6yJ4J0EmWknL096jIE6CnzF FRslQ3B1UKDjxVsm1ZHfir5NeWszLkTvGFsddFaWTgh8UycESG6VQzKXjjewXu2pG7YQYRpj QKm1W5X2TkwWkXRBZTmfmbhxIUMh3+zf5wQ463rSmDN/8v81tdqBtAW6rH/kzg1GvkaTHXn0 507yEHFzBksk2viAuIxxr7km8+/KARYLIdGtx30EG8cKzAUZOK6WqxtNCsXUJNrVE8CWrCaD icoNu7Fs1c5hmPHdSTnU48ce67449DdnO4neLSNhRiGlMHJgfJUmgrxu/hcYeOZ3haWmEQ2w uW1Mh01OHi8QZHCEyAbABrPs9GUgccc/4eYXX9hIgxfSkYzn8f+8NuIFPWl/0uTvjgqU29FQ SbzOLxHq9439Ox40G5mS5eZXRGxITYR+6TXvRGI6P/264jvflnr/pDGUttaikU+0W+1uxgKH cmYbEc7ATQRbGTU1AQgAn0H6UrFiWcovkh6EXVcl+SeqyO6JHOPm+e9Wu0Vw+VIUvXZVUVVQ La1PQDUi6j00ChlcR66g9/V0sPIcSutacPKfdKYOBvzd4rlhL8rfrdEsQw5ApZxrA8kYZVMh FmBRKAa6wos25moTlMKpCWzTH84+WO5+ziCTsTUZASAToz3RdunTD+vQcHj0GqNTPAHK63sf bAB2I0BslZkXkY1RLb/YhuA6E7JyEd2pilZOrIuBGl/5q2qSakgnAVFWFBR/DO27JuAksYnq +aH8vI0xGvwn75KqSk4UzAkDzWSmO4ZHuahKtQgZNsMYV+PGayRBX9b9zbldzopoLBdqHc4n jQARAQABwsF8BBgBCgAmAhsMFiEEqUDUNJksLo6ZED1QIk+n58yCpmQFAmfIHFQFCRYU6J8A CgkQIk+n58yCpmS2PA//bqN1LfcotmArgElsa+0EGZSQlYgK48pm8WAeTXTngudP9IJ4SuKY HR5RNjHcBeqN+Me0zxRqYzRb8nGanHEkDyf4Im8DQM8d6vbyU+FcPmG4skud4kgS1zMHnlVd SXfSIwKC/hKgdHG8aBV7545Lz9X6Iohea+94wneD0aw/hqF+QWewGZhWJriWAZtvEkzNjQOi 4U9F/trLten/x7bpphDSnDMKJtITbtzATT1Dq7o7VpIUK1nCTQALMuMjKCdi8OdU/+V+R3O4 0PXWvX8qrvqYapVbZ+9KqT74FsuB0Ya9uXwgBF2Q6cRuETZk5vqaqKxzqoQZCO8AOz/58j6O 2RHNy/mZEN+7tJ5Tsq42zVJ4jxsT8b9YplavCMsnBgDeRWhcbYhCyttoL7nYISyWg4kQYZ/P wIV3OuNv2f8iKYsxNsRuClOAF82+gvqOy1/1pprFjy8uo2pkoOrb63aOP3vO5VHnRKgra6dq NcaZ+c6J4H+nEJGi2SkHAUJz5oBzuThvPudLvPA/SK8sKoM01IRxSihev/S/5WLazXB1PGem OCbvzC1IjWJJraxiDJ5IygokapUa2RP7+WBR22skQ3SSl6G107QgWKSyTOGWEaRmV53vxQLV jXuCmzSSasTL60zq5yGrT4/DYQVSNEUiUbG4pYekxJujNeEDkUlky0Y= In-Reply-To: <20260923063759.34667-1-hao.ge@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Cc Christoph On 9/23/26 08:37, Hao Ge wrote: > Commit 1d78d56c43ef ("netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in writeback by > adding a mempool") added a mempool for the folio_queues and made the > request, subrequest and folio_queue allocations distinguish between > writeback and everything else. Writeback is part of memory reclaim > and must not fail due to ENOMEM, so it allocates under GFP_NOFS > through mempool_alloc(), which may dip into the pool's reserve and, > if that runs empty, wait for elements to be returned. The > GFP_KERNEL paths, which can return -ENOMEM to their callers, invoke > the pool's ->alloc() callback directly instead. > > The direct call, however, skips the alloc_hooks() wrapper that the > mempool_alloc() macro provides. The pool callbacks, mempool_alloc_slab() > and mempool_kmalloc(), call kmem_cache_alloc_noprof() and kmalloc_noprof() > and rely on current->alloc_tag having been set by the caller. With > CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG=y this leads to > > current->alloc_tag not set > WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161 at __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook > alloc_tag was not set > WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:166 at __alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook > > at allocation and free time respectively, as reported when reading > files on a CIFS mount. The allocations are also missing from > /proc/allocinfo. > > Wrap the direct ->alloc() invocations in alloc_hooks() with a new > mempool_alloc_noreserve() helper in include/linux/mempool.h, next to > the other alloc_hooks()-wrapped macros such as mempool_alloc(). The > GFP_KERNEL paths keep their failable allocation semantics, they just > get tagged now. > > Fixes: 1d78d56c43ef ("netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in writeback by adding a mempool") > Reported-by: Erhard Furtner > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0b004319-9ef7-437c-a4dd-174d6a9a83db@mailbox.org/ > Tested-by: Erhard Furtner > Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Hao Ge Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) Seems ok enough as a hotfix. The naming perhaps isn't ideal, we have mempool_alloc_preallocated() already for the opposite case. Maybe mempool_alloc_no_preallocated() to complement it? Rather long though. I guess long-term it would be neater to have a mempool_alloc() variant with extra parameter that says if preallocated pool is allowed or not. The "gfp == GFP_KERNEL" check is probably not an universal one. mempool_alloc() is actually rather aggressive in getting objects from the pool before even attempting reclaim. Makes sense for I/O usecases but maybe not for this one? > --- > Changes in v2: > - Move the alloc_hooks() wrapper from fs/netfs/internal.h into > include/linux/mempool.h as mempool_alloc_noreserve(), per Suren's > suggestion, so it is not netfs-specific. > > v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260922023541.51532-1-hao.ge@linux.dev/ > --- > fs/netfs/objects.c | 4 ++-- > fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c | 2 +- > include/linux/mempool.h | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c > index 7f6a3e912602..ad549daa9c79 100644 > --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c > +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct address_space *mapping, > > rreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, gfp); > } else { > - rreq = mempool->alloc(gfp, mempool->pool_data); > + rreq = mempool_alloc_noreserve(mempool, gfp); > if (!rreq) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > } > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct netfs_io_subrequest *netfs_alloc_subrequest(struct netfs_io_request *rreq > struct kmem_cache *cache = mempool->pool_data; > > if (rreq->gfp == GFP_KERNEL) > - subreq = mempool->alloc(rreq->gfp, mempool->pool_data); > + subreq = mempool_alloc_noreserve(mempool, rreq->gfp); > else > subreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, rreq->gfp); > if (!subreq) > diff --git a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c > index 424e77a9a109..d30d5ef6d86e 100644 > --- a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c > +++ b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct folio_queue *netfs_folioq_alloc(unsigned int rreq_id, gfp_t gfp, > struct folio_queue *fq; > > if (gfp == GFP_KERNEL) > - fq = netfs_folioq_pool.alloc(gfp, netfs_folioq_pool.pool_data); > + fq = mempool_alloc_noreserve(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp); > else > fq = mempool_alloc(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp); > if (fq) { > diff --git a/include/linux/mempool.h b/include/linux/mempool.h > index a0fa6d43e0dc..6da502aef2f7 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mempool.h > +++ b/include/linux/mempool.h > @@ -70,6 +70,13 @@ int mempool_alloc_bulk_noprof(struct mempool *pool, void **elem, > #define mempool_alloc_bulk(...) \ > alloc_hooks(mempool_alloc_bulk_noprof(__VA_ARGS__)) > > +/* > + * Allocate a new element without dipping into the pool's reserves or > + * waiting. Returns NULL on failure. > + */ > +#define mempool_alloc_noreserve(_pool, _gfp) \ > + alloc_hooks((_pool)->alloc(_gfp, (_pool)->pool_data)) > + > void *mempool_alloc_preallocated(struct mempool *pool) __malloc; > void mempool_free(void *element, struct mempool *pool); > unsigned int mempool_free_bulk(struct mempool *pool, void **elem,