From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pps: Don't allow PPS_KC_BIND on removed devices
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 09:50:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ddb957d-3a20-4b92-b77f-dfc4b8cb3dca@enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <672778c177ac9b6fdcb445e35c97ac4ca7d1149f.1780506611.git.calvin@wbinvd.org>
On 03/06/2026 19:25, Calvin Owens wrote:
> If userspace holds its file descriptor open, it can call PPS_KC_BIND on
> a device which has been unplugged, leaving pps_kc_hardpps_dev as a
> dangling pointer after close().
>
> After that sequence, PPS_KC_BIND is broken until the system is rebooted,
> because the pointer comparison in pps_kc_bind() can never be true.
>
> calling pps_ktimer_init+0x0/0x1000 [pps_ktimer] @ 1081
> initcall pps_ktimer_init+0x0/0x1000 [pps_ktimer] returned 0 after 811 usecs
> pps pps0: bound kernel consumer: edge=0x1
> pps pps0: unbound kernel consumer on device removal
> pps pps0: bound kernel consumer: edge=0x1
> calling pps_ktimer_init+0x0/0x1000 [pps_ktimer] @ 1085
> initcall pps_ktimer_init+0x0/0x1000 [pps_ktimer] returned 0 after 340 usecs
> pps pps0: another kernel consumer is already bound
>
> Here is a short reproducer, which uses rmmod of the pps-ktimer testcase
> to simulate a device being unplugged:
>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> #include <linux/pps.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <err.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> while (1) {
> int fd;
>
> if (system("insmod ./pps-ktimer.ko"))
> err(1, "insmod failed");
>
> fd = open("/dev/pps0", O_RDWR);
> if (fd == -1)
> err(1, "open failed");
>
> struct pps_bind_args args = {
> .tsformat = PPS_TSFMT_TSPEC,
> .edge = PPS_CAPTUREASSERT,
> .consumer = PPS_KC_HARDPPS,
> };
>
> if (ioctl(fd, PPS_KC_BIND, &args))
> err(1, "first PPS_KC_BIND failed");
>
> if (system("rmmod pps-ktimer"))
> err(1, "rmmod failed");
>
> if (ioctl(fd, PPS_KC_BIND, &args)) {
> if (errno != ENODEV)
> err(1, "second PPS_KC_BIND failed");
> else
> puts("Got ENODEV, kernel is patched");
> }
>
> close(fd);
> }
> }
>
> Fix this by setting a flag when the device is unplugged, returning
> -ENODEV from PPS_KC_BIND if the flag is set.
>
> For userspace to encounter this new behavior, it must do something which
> breaks the interface today, so this fix shouldn't cause any observable
> behavior change for working programs.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1779733602.git.calvin%40wbinvd.org?part=1
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * Drop guard() changes so irqs are unmasked for printk() calls [Rodolfo]
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c9bfee54cbabbbfc8da7aa3d3893cf61d3ebf3b2.1780108479.git.calvin@wbinvd.org/
>
> drivers/pps/kc.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/pps_kernel.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pps/kc.c b/drivers/pps/kc.c
> index fbd23295afd7..4f8fffa7edd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pps/kc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pps/kc.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,14 @@ int pps_kc_bind(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_bind_args *bind_args)
> /* Check if another consumer is already bound */
> spin_lock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
>
> + /*
> + * Don't allow PPS_KC_BIND on a removed device.
> + */
> + if (pps->kc_removed) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> if (bind_args->edge == 0)
> if (pps_kc_hardpps_dev == pps) {
> pps_kc_hardpps_mode = 0;
> @@ -79,6 +87,8 @@ int pps_kc_bind(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_bind_args *bind_args)
> void pps_kc_remove(struct pps_device *pps)
> {
> spin_lock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
> +
> + pps->kc_removed = true;
> if (pps == pps_kc_hardpps_dev) {
> pps_kc_hardpps_mode = 0;
> pps_kc_hardpps_dev = NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
> index aab0aebb529e..3c2979f8a5ac 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct pps_device {
> struct device dev;
> struct fasync_struct *async_queue; /* fasync method */
> spinlock_t lock;
> + bool kc_removed;
> };
>
> /*
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 17:25 Calvin Owens
2026-06-04 7:50 ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ddb957d-3a20-4b92-b77f-dfc4b8cb3dca@enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=calvin@wbinvd.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®