mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: <bp@alien8.de>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: <hpa@zytor.com>, <fustini@kernel.org>, <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
	<peternewman@google.com>, <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
	<tony.luck@intel.com>, <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	<james.morse@arm.com>, <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	<babu.moger@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Cleanups in preparation for multiple controls support
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 16:26:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dfb141b-7b92-423b-8603-12d99ad1b2e7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1793834224.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Dear x86 maintainers,

Could you please consider this series for inclusion?

Thank you very much.

Reinette

On 11/4/26 4:13 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Changes since v2:
>   - v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1791406459.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com/
>   - Rebase on v7.4-rc1.
>   - Add tags. All patches now have at least two Reviewed-by tags.
>   - No other changes.
> 
> Changes since v1:
>   - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1788452481.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com/
>   - Rebase on x86/cache branch of tip with HEAD at:
>       50e5282df427 ("x86,fs/resctrl: Add event group descriptions for Intel Diamond Rapids")
>   - Rework all changelogs. Most now explain why each change is safe and why it
>     is needed independent of the multiple controls work. (Ben)
>   - Make subject lines more specific and fix the prefix of the patch removing
>     the non-linear bandwidth delay mapping.
>   - Keep the informational message printed when an Intel system with non-linear
>     MBA delay values is encountered, rewording it and adding the missing
>     newline. Match the related warning to the same wording. (Chenyu)
>   - Group the memory bandwidth property assignments during Intel MBA enumeration.
>   - Clarify in kernel-doc that the MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG scope property only
>     applies to cache resources.
>   - Add Reviewed-by tags from Chenyu and Ben.
> 
> Hi Everybody,
> 
> For resource allocation resctrl assumes there is only one way to allocate
> portions of a resource. That is, every resource supporting allocation has a
> single control in the schemata file that user space can use to allocate
> portions of that resource.
> 
> All architectures supported by resctrl already support, or will soon support,
> multiple controls per resource. For example, the memory bandwidth resource may
> have a "maximum bandwidth" as well as a "minimum bandwidth" control.
> 
> Adding support for multiple controls to resctrl is a major endeavour. The goals
> are described in [1] and summarized in the Linux Plumbers Conference 2025
> slides [2]. The implementation is in progress, with the most recent PoC
> available at [3].
> 
> This series contains the preparatory cleanups from the PoC that are ready to be
> merged independently of the remaining work:
> - Remove the unused support for non-linear Intel MBA delay values, including a
>   user space configuration check that can never fail.
> - Make the scope of MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG a private x86 property instead of
>   a resctrl filesystem cache property.
> - Drop an unnecessary helper and an unnecessary function parameter.
> 
> The only intended functional change is a reworded informational message
> printed if an Intel system with non-linear MBA delay values is encountered.
> 
> Changes since previous postings can be found in the individual patches.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aPtfMFfLV1l%2FRB0L@e133380.arm.com/
> [2] https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2093/attachments/1958/4172/resctrl%20Microconference%20LPC%202025%20Tokyo.pdf
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d258a32f-12d5-464d-abe9-4720fb3e44b3@intel.com/
> 
> Reinette Chatre (5):
>   x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unused non-linear bandwidth delay mapping
>   x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unnecessary non-linear MBA configuration check
>   x86,fs/resctrl: Move MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG scope property to x86
>     resource
>   fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary is_mba_linear() helper
>   fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary parameter from
>     resctrl_io_alloc_parse_line()
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c     | 72 ++++++++------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h |  4 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c |  4 +-
>  fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c               | 15 ++----
>  fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c                  |  7 +--
>  include/linux/resctrl.h                |  7 ---
>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05  0:13 Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05  0:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unused non-linear bandwidth delay mapping Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05  0:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unnecessary non-linear MBA configuration check Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05  0:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Move MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG scope property to x86 resource Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05  0:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary is_mba_linear() helper Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05  0:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary parameter from resctrl_io_alloc_parse_line() Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05  0:26 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0dfb141b-7b92-423b-8603-12d99ad1b2e7@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=fustini@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®