From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: <bp@alien8.de>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: <hpa@zytor.com>, <fustini@kernel.org>, <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
<peternewman@google.com>, <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
<tony.luck@intel.com>, <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
<james.morse@arm.com>, <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
<babu.moger@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Cleanups in preparation for multiple controls support
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 16:26:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dfb141b-7b92-423b-8603-12d99ad1b2e7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1793834224.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Dear x86 maintainers,
Could you please consider this series for inclusion?
Thank you very much.
Reinette
On 11/4/26 4:13 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Changes since v2:
> - v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1791406459.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com/
> - Rebase on v7.4-rc1.
> - Add tags. All patches now have at least two Reviewed-by tags.
> - No other changes.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1788452481.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com/
> - Rebase on x86/cache branch of tip with HEAD at:
> 50e5282df427 ("x86,fs/resctrl: Add event group descriptions for Intel Diamond Rapids")
> - Rework all changelogs. Most now explain why each change is safe and why it
> is needed independent of the multiple controls work. (Ben)
> - Make subject lines more specific and fix the prefix of the patch removing
> the non-linear bandwidth delay mapping.
> - Keep the informational message printed when an Intel system with non-linear
> MBA delay values is encountered, rewording it and adding the missing
> newline. Match the related warning to the same wording. (Chenyu)
> - Group the memory bandwidth property assignments during Intel MBA enumeration.
> - Clarify in kernel-doc that the MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG scope property only
> applies to cache resources.
> - Add Reviewed-by tags from Chenyu and Ben.
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> For resource allocation resctrl assumes there is only one way to allocate
> portions of a resource. That is, every resource supporting allocation has a
> single control in the schemata file that user space can use to allocate
> portions of that resource.
>
> All architectures supported by resctrl already support, or will soon support,
> multiple controls per resource. For example, the memory bandwidth resource may
> have a "maximum bandwidth" as well as a "minimum bandwidth" control.
>
> Adding support for multiple controls to resctrl is a major endeavour. The goals
> are described in [1] and summarized in the Linux Plumbers Conference 2025
> slides [2]. The implementation is in progress, with the most recent PoC
> available at [3].
>
> This series contains the preparatory cleanups from the PoC that are ready to be
> merged independently of the remaining work:
> - Remove the unused support for non-linear Intel MBA delay values, including a
> user space configuration check that can never fail.
> - Make the scope of MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG a private x86 property instead of
> a resctrl filesystem cache property.
> - Drop an unnecessary helper and an unnecessary function parameter.
>
> The only intended functional change is a reworded informational message
> printed if an Intel system with non-linear MBA delay values is encountered.
>
> Changes since previous postings can be found in the individual patches.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aPtfMFfLV1l%2FRB0L@e133380.arm.com/
> [2] https://lpc.events/event/19/contributions/2093/attachments/1958/4172/resctrl%20Microconference%20LPC%202025%20Tokyo.pdf
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d258a32f-12d5-464d-abe9-4720fb3e44b3@intel.com/
>
> Reinette Chatre (5):
> x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unused non-linear bandwidth delay mapping
> x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unnecessary non-linear MBA configuration check
> x86,fs/resctrl: Move MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG scope property to x86
> resource
> fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary is_mba_linear() helper
> fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary parameter from
> resctrl_io_alloc_parse_line()
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 72 ++++++++------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 4 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 4 +-
> fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 15 ++----
> fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 7 +--
> include/linux/resctrl.h | 7 ---
> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 0:13 Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unused non-linear bandwidth delay mapping Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unnecessary non-linear MBA configuration check Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86,fs/resctrl: Move MSR_IA32_L{2,3}_QOS_CFG scope property to x86 resource Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary is_mba_linear() helper Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05 0:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] fs/resctrl: Drop unnecessary parameter from resctrl_io_alloc_parse_line() Reinette Chatre
2026-11-05 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0dfb141b-7b92-423b-8603-12d99ad1b2e7@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®