From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Exclude special DL entities from bandwidth moves
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 10:47:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e305573-9046-4ecd-84f9-357cbc82449f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528065324.1303334-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
On 5/28/26 07:53, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
> From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>
> SUGOV special DL entities use fake/unused bandwidth. They are already
> excluded from regular DL admission control, affinity admission checks,
> rq bandwidth accounting, and root-domain rebuild accounting.
>
> dl_task_needs_bw_move() misses the same exclusion. As a result,
> set_cpus_allowed_dl() and cpuset attach may treat a special DL entity as
> requiring a root-domain bandwidth move when its affinity mask no longer
> intersects the source root domain.
>
> Return false for special DL entities so root-domain bandwidth move
> accounting follows the rest of the SUGOV special-entity handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index ddfd6bc63ab1..3653166caa69 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -3142,7 +3142,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_dl(struct task_struct *p,
> bool dl_task_needs_bw_move(struct task_struct *p,
> const struct cpumask *new_mask)
> {
> - if (!dl_task(p))
> + if (!dl_task(p) || dl_entity_is_special(&p->dl))
> return false;
>
> return !cpumask_intersects(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask);
FWIW I don't see an issue excluding sugov here:
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 6:53 Guopeng Zhang
2026-05-28 9:47 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-05-28 12:24 ` Juri Lelli
2026-06-29 5:43 ` Guopeng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e305573-9046-4ecd-84f9-357cbc82449f@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®