From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73093C48BD7 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5219320B7C for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="bz9ZvbKk"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="EZDHDrlL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726841AbfF0SWH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:22:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43574 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726508AbfF0SWG (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:22:06 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37A1060A0A; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:22:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1561659726; bh=L4rcvZr/+aW0fXo6jf8y6SY/AYN6T06PMSeRbTAx/RQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=bz9ZvbKk+19cPUYMoVAHtGANzVgSuBRp/ozL/ndHQM3D8RVuuxcyw0hTF86WXXS6h 9++uVXYO49wWWrosmRXwMNfFrXvbdoXXQFNHytkfUTh7AqWIurHlJvAFBxGMSl+gX4 iwuMbPOmm7qrzRH2MOeyYiNBi5yJumE/Ks0JAHMk= Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [157.45.87.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: saiprakash.ranjan@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9AB56021C; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:21:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1561659725; bh=L4rcvZr/+aW0fXo6jf8y6SY/AYN6T06PMSeRbTAx/RQ=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=EZDHDrlLSCTmFKqx3BjfzxaFmF3ZfvGKnPZ5oWdKl9PIvqN5VaMsgsaMgh86g7I3E rmbmn62Xl/6Z7nbfE7QJri2QUjRtXObt411a6Tv3fJOospRRPIYZFancWErn1IpP6R 4EcuZvfI5z8eOvnDDh7F44ysWsqGuVtl6bbrle7g= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org C9AB56021C Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 1/1] coresight: Do not default to CPU0 for missing CPU phandle To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Suzuki K Poulose , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Leo Yan , Alexander Shishkin , David Brown , Mark Rutland , Rajendra Nayak , Vivek Gautam , Sibi Sankar , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm References: <0a20cf9eb34b14a191381af98af1694bbc222734.1561610498.git.saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> From: Sai Prakash Ranjan Message-ID: <0e33a1f2-f535-91e3-635d-dc8852833a0b@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 23:51:56 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/27/2019 10:54 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > I want to apply your code to my tree but it isn't easy for me to do > so. Did you notice the checkpatch.pl warning about the DT bindings > being in a separate patch? In this case it is not a new binding but > following the process gives the DT maintainers the opportunity to at > least look at your patch. Because the changes are trivial they may > decide to ignore it but that choice it theirs to make. > Hmm, git log on coresight dt-bindings showed some examples like this where bindings were updated in the same patch. Anyways, I have separated out the patch now and resent v5. Thanks, Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation