mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: cai@gmx.us, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 17:41:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e926f4b-1148-289b-39a1-ef76baa8cf9d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPKp9uY7DOV9xMhCQcAC8yh0z3-=2U-CmZq064Br=d4VYrcg=A@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/11/18 17:28, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:10 PM Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>>
> [...]
> 
>>
>> See bb42ca474010 and d003d029cea8 for details.
>>
>> Now, activating this workaround leads to lockdep being really angry,
>> most likely because the cpus_read_lock is not taken, which is a change
>> in behaviour...
>>
>> I'm trying to dig into this now.
>>
> 
> Yes we found similar issue in kernel/sched/core.c sched_init_smp
> There's a fix with detailed description in -next
> (Commit 40fa3780bac2 ("sched/core: Take the hotplug lock in sched_init_smp()")
> 
> The behaviour changed since  commit cb538267ea1e ("jump_label/lockdep:
> Assert we hold the hotplug lock for _cpuslocked() operations")

I indeed came to the same conclusion, but the fix is slightly less than
obvious. I have the following arm64-specific crap, but it is pretty
terrible:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
index f258636273c9..9e96e9eaca9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <linux/clocksource.h>
 #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>

 #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>

@@ -69,7 +70,9 @@ void __init time_init(void)
 	u32 arch_timer_rate;

 	of_clk_init(NULL);
+	cpus_read_lock();
 	timer_probe();
+	cpus_read_unlock();

 	tick_setup_hrtimer_broadcast();

Qian, can you please let me know if this helps? If it does, we'll have
to think of something a bit better...

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-09 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08 20:59 Qian Cai
2018-11-09 12:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-09 12:28   ` Qian Cai
2018-11-09 13:50     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-09 15:28       ` Qian Cai
2018-11-09 15:38         ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-09 15:52           ` Qian Cai
2018-11-09 16:06             ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-09 17:28               ` Sudeep Holla
2018-11-09 17:41                 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2018-11-09 18:41                   ` Qian Cai
2018-11-12  8:39                     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-12-02  4:16                       ` Qian Cai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e926f4b-1148-289b-39a1-ef76baa8cf9d@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=cai@gmx.us \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®