From: Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@hetzner-cloud.de>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/6] selftests/bpf: add test for XDP metadata support in tun driver
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:29:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ec1f766-a0be-42ed-b505-0fc94205f724@hetzner-cloud.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z79k0vKn39XsZ-j7@mini-arch>
Am 26.02.25 um 20:00 schrieb Stanislav Fomichev:
> On 02/26, Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
>> Am 24.02.25 um 18:14 schrieb Stanislav Fomichev:
>>> On 02/24, Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>> +void test_xdp_context_tuntap(void)
>>>
>>> tap0 is already used by lwt tests, so there is a chance this new test
>>> will clash with it? Should we run your new test in a net namespace
>>> to be safe? Bastien recently added a change where you can make
>>> your test run in a net ns by naming the function test_ns_xxx.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, cool, I didn't know of that feature.
>>
>> For reference, you probably mean this one?
>> commit c047e0e0e435 ("selftests/bpf: Optionally open a dedicated namespace to run test in it")
>
> Yes.
>
>> As long as the tests are not run in parallel, the test function SHOULD
>> clean up well enough behind itself that no conflicts should occur.
>> But having that bit of extra safety won't hurt.
>
> The test you're adding is gonna be running in parallel with most of the
> other test cases. If you want it to be executed in a serial fashion
> (which I don't think you do, running in parallel in a ns is a better
> option), the function as to be called serial_test_xxx.
>
Ah, I didn't know parallel execution is opt-out. Then I must have been
lucky that it didn't cause issues.
Added it in the V4 patch series that I'll send in a bit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 15:29 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] XDP metadata support for " Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] net: tun: enable XDP metadata support Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-26 5:50 ` Jason Wang
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/6] net: tun: enable transfer of XDP metadata to skb Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:26 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-26 5:59 ` Jason Wang
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/6] selftests/bpf: move open_tuntap to network helpers Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-26 6:31 ` Jason Wang
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] selftests/bpf: refactor xdp_context_functional test and bpf program Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 17:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-26 15:56 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 15:07 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-26 17:39 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-26 17:14 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/6] selftests/bpf: add test for XDP metadata support in tun driver Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-24 17:14 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-26 18:50 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-26 19:00 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-02-26 19:29 ` Marcus Wichelmann [this message]
2025-02-24 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/6] selftests/bpf: fix file descriptor assertion in open_tuntap helper Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-25 14:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] XDP metadata support for tun driver Willem de Bruijn
2025-02-25 15:03 ` Marcus Wichelmann
2025-02-25 18:14 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ec1f766-a0be-42ed-b505-0fc94205f724@hetzner-cloud.de \
--to=marcus.wichelmann@hetzner-cloud.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®