From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
"Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"tglx@kernel.org" <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] x86/virt/seamldr: Support large TDX module binaries
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 22:34:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ee3d9592e4e73bd0e5bedafc836033fdfc9f120.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106132159.1551365-2-chao.gao@intel.com>
On Fri, 2026-11-06 at 05:21 -0800, Chao Gao wrote:
> The module binary is handed to P-SEAMLDR as a list of page physical
> addresses in 'struct seamldr_params'. The list has 496 entries, which
> caps a module at 496 pages.
nit. change it to "...caps a module at the same number of pages".
>
> TDX modules are gaining features and are about to outgrow that limit.
>
> The P-SEAMLDR ABI was extended to chain the list across 4KB pages. For
> a module over 495 pages, the last of the 496 entries points to another
> page of entries instead of to a module page. The last entry of that
> page can point to yet another page, and so on, until every module page
> is listed.
>
> Grow module_pages_pa_list[] so that 'struct seamldr_params' spans
> multiple pages (16 for now), and use the extra pages as the chained
> pages. The last entry of each page then points to the entry right after
> it, which starts the next page. These link entries do not hold module
> pages, so leave them out of the maximum module page count.
>
> The 16-page size is somewhat arbitrary. It fits modules of up to about
> 32MB, far above the roughly 2MB of current modules. It wastes 60KB for
> today's modules, which is fine because the memory is freed right after
> the update. Sizing module_pages_pa_list[] per module would mean either
> moving the allocation after the image header is validated, or allocating
> from an unvalidated page count. Either way it is more code churn.
>
> Do not query P-SEAMLDR for chaining support. Userspace selects the update
> image and is responsible for ensuring the module is compatible with
> P-SEAMLDR.
>
> Thanks to Yilun for the idea of allocating the chain pages together
> with 'struct seamldr_params'.
I'm not sure what this means.
>
> AI was used under supervision to review code and workshop logs.
Same comment as on the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Make 'struct seamldr_params' a fixed 16 pages instead of sizing it
> to each module, capping modules at about 32MB. [Rick]
> - Drop the patch that moved the allocation after image validation. [Rick]
> ---
> arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamldr.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamldr.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamldr.c
> index b1137ca6150d..087bdf10a9a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamldr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/seamldr.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,18 @@
> #define P_SEAMLDR_INFO 0x8000000000000000
> #define P_SEAMLDR_INSTALL 0x8000000000000001
>
> -#define SEAMLDR_MAX_NR_MODULE_PAGES 496
> +/*
> + * module_pages_pa_list[] spans multiple pages. The last entry of each
> + * page points to the next page and does not hold a module page, so the
> + * maximum number of module pages is the array size minus one entry per
> + * page.
> + *
> + * SEAMLDR_PARAMS_NR_PAGES is somewhat arbitrary. It allows modules of
> + * up to about 32MB. Increase it if modules outgrow that.
> + */
> +#define SEAMLDR_PARAMS_NR_PAGES 16
> +#define SEAMLDR_NR_MODULE_PA_ENTRIES (496 + 512 * (SEAMLDR_PARAMS_NR_PAGES - 1))
I think you should describe the math a little bit here. 496 is the space in the
original format, but the last one is now a pa pointer, right? So can't be used
as a page of module data. And then each successive page is 511 entries and then
a pa pointer? So is the math actually right?
> +#define SEAMLDR_MAX_NR_MODULE_PAGES (SEAMLDR_NR_MODULE_PA_ENTRIES - SEAMLDR_PARAMS_NR_PAGES)
> #define SEAMLDR_MAX_NR_SIG_PAGES 1
>
> /*
> @@ -48,10 +59,10 @@ struct seamldr_params {
> u64 sigstruct_pages_pa_list[SEAMLDR_MAX_NR_SIG_PAGES];
> u8 reserved[104];
> u64 module_nr_pages;
> - u64 module_pages_pa_list[SEAMLDR_MAX_NR_MODULE_PAGES];
> + u64 module_pages_pa_list[SEAMLDR_NR_MODULE_PA_ENTRIES];
> } __packed;
>
> -static_assert(sizeof(struct seamldr_params) == 4096);
> +static_assert(sizeof(struct seamldr_params) == SEAMLDR_PARAMS_NR_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE);
>
> /*
> * Serialize P-SEAMLDR calls since the hardware only allows a single CPU to
> @@ -129,17 +140,24 @@ struct tdx_image {
> /*
> * Given a vmalloc() allocation, write all of the backing physical
> * addresses to pa_list[]. Caller guarantees that the array is big
> - * enough.
> + * enough. If pa_list[] spans multiple pages, point the last entry
> + * of each page to the next page.
> */
> static void populate_pa_list(u64 *pa_list, const u8 *vmalloc_addr, u32 vmalloc_len_pages)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, j;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < vmalloc_len_pages; i++) {
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < vmalloc_len_pages; i++) {
> unsigned long offset = i * PAGE_SIZE;
> unsigned long pfn = vmalloc_to_pfn(&vmalloc_addr[offset]);
>
> - pa_list[i] = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
How about a little:
/* If the current entry is the last in the page. */
> + if (PAGE_ALIGNED(&pa_list[j + 1])) {
> + pa_list[j] = __pa(&pa_list[j + 1]);
> + j++;
> + }
> +
> + pa_list[j] = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + j++;
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 13:21 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] TDX: P-SEAMLDR: Support large TDX modules and sigstructs Chao Gao
2026-11-06 13:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] x86/virt/seamldr: Support large TDX module binaries Chao Gao
2026-11-09 22:34 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2026-11-06 13:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] x86/virt/seamldr: Support multiple sigstruct pages Chao Gao
2026-11-09 22:12 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-11-09 22:19 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ee3d9592e4e73bd0e5bedafc836033fdfc9f120.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®