From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754540AbdCBJdr (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:33:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:33501 "EHLO mail-pg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754227AbdCBJdj (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:33:39 -0500 From: Viresh Kumar To: Rafael Wysocki , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: schedutil: move cached_raw_freq to struct sugov_policy Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:03:20 +0530 Message-Id: <0ee63c640d47281997d544d05f9dd543aef80588.1488437503.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cached_raw_freq applies to the entire cpufreq policy and not individual CPUs. Apart from wasting per-cpu memory, it is actually wrong to keep it in struct sugov_cpu as we may end up comparing next_freq with a stale cached_raw_freq of a random CPU. Move cached_raw_freq to struct sugov_policy. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 306d97e7b57c..721f4e011366 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct sugov_policy { u64 last_freq_update_time; s64 freq_update_delay_ns; unsigned int next_freq; + unsigned int cached_raw_freq; /* The next fields are only needed if fast switch cannot be used. */ struct irq_work irq_work; @@ -51,7 +52,6 @@ struct sugov_cpu { struct update_util_data update_util; struct sugov_policy *sg_policy; - unsigned int cached_raw_freq; unsigned long iowait_boost; unsigned long iowait_boost_max; u64 last_update; @@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long util, freq = (freq + (freq >> 2)) * util / max; - if (freq == sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq && sg_policy->next_freq != UINT_MAX) + if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && sg_policy->next_freq != UINT_MAX) return sg_policy->next_freq; - sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq = freq; + sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = freq; return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq); } @@ -579,6 +579,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) sg_policy->next_freq = UINT_MAX; sg_policy->work_in_progress = false; sg_policy->need_freq_update = false; + sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = 0; for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) { struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, cpu); @@ -589,7 +590,6 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) sg_cpu->max = 0; sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT; sg_cpu->last_update = 0; - sg_cpu->cached_raw_freq = 0; sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0; sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu, &sg_cpu->update_util, -- 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b