From: Wang Xiaolei <xiaoleiwangxiaolei@gmail.com>
To: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: jm5905938@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, error27@gmail.com, damon@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon/core: reject empty access pattern intervals on scheme commit
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 09:45:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ee661a9-b642-424f-99a1-21c9731c53aa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105013653.88123-1-sj@kernel.org>
在 2026/11/5 9:36, SJ Park 写道:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2026 09:17:24 +0800 Wang Xiaolei <xiaoleiwangxiaolei@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi SeongJae and Aveline
>>
>> Thank you both for the careful review.
>>
>> I appreciate the clarification that DAMON simply executes what
>>
>> the user configured, and that this is more of an input validation
>>
>> improvement than a bug fix. Perhaps I was too aggressive in framing
>>
>> it as a bug.
> Thank you for clarifying. But my point is that this change might be just
> unnecessary behavior change rather than an improvement. What do you think?
Hi SeongJae
Thank you again for the clear explanation.
I agree with you . My earlier framing was wrong;
I won't push this patch further. Let me focus on the
other items that are genuine bugs instead.
thanks
xiaolei
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 10:54 Xiaolei Wang (Kaihong)
2026-11-03 11:44 ` Aveline Noir
2026-11-03 14:53 ` SJ Park
2026-11-04 1:17 ` Wang Xiaolei
2026-11-05 1:36 ` SJ Park
2026-11-05 1:45 ` Wang Xiaolei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0ee661a9-b642-424f-99a1-21c9731c53aa@gmail.com \
--to=xiaoleiwangxiaolei@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=jm5905938@gmail.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®