From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFCAA4596C; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709283151; cv=none; b=n7feEQ8j9PSctL1In23YnOVgLnuqGBwpHIKS8DJnE88kIP6ofv1y3bfRvSZHdMm8C4gjBLoYfz0sZlOa8Q6ZGE+WUs45ESFmAQ4oYGFUDcCZLNTViIOAQFmBnufuV0GNn6TIU9wrv5BZiIfbGPq3f+1J+5VsvPRbMs7zllsiWys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709283151; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CoA/3xdsDd4t5ac8pY/l+2uKa5imLpXNOKYGL42GD1M=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=YWfM9q7Px3eOoyIMY7Oggk/fXqyLcmKqAPFx/pGddSlED0X2sq/98CajBHQ+aMFzk2xE0kLNGLVDp4BdMZgsDgwimjAFDg05lw0qqYqwr3+1Y6c9V3KmpbFnkZCcsq14oc8lbWbRyvd3U9LCLxFt69qv6FCOnM42eqTKze6FASU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=2eLU34MP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="2eLU34MP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1709283148; bh=CoA/3xdsDd4t5ac8pY/l+2uKa5imLpXNOKYGL42GD1M=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=2eLU34MPpen1ZPVUW41Vx70RazzxeE1NBcPieddH4Krxxgv3kzhQQh3oawbOOGizh Na8mptoha3JHdsZaeIPwWm+h3V4UbLvjOVbt7x8PXCF4MC1RbwdpPuBE2m45McZYXc RFaPHyMfY9pA8B6g5UFuZvKdevNvf5sLuVmE0ZQFF/v4NBPZv/5vK2ceUsVX1SNUcC oCqN6onOsmLhmC9kLw+8Kg9JFu30n36+bl2NPtcq05mrl2Mqqf1WibDkR4/N/kbljE PBjWZiSi1i6wk7u7j0UR5u3q3tWgGtBRfEW87GqEofuJTsNqIMF641LzuRglfq9lOz oaRaRM0D9F/dg== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D5013782017; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0ef31c6f-86f1-4824-a7d0-a1d8798b6647@collabora.com> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:52:27 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: mediatek: cherry: Describe CPU supplies Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4gUHJhZG8=?= Cc: Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Matthias Brugger , kernel@collabora.com, Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20240110142305.755367-1-nfraprado@collabora.com> <20240110142305.755367-2-nfraprado@collabora.com> <8a45151a-1d51-4001-b0f9-9cfb0027232a@notapiano> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <8a45151a-1d51-4001-b0f9-9cfb0027232a@notapiano> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Il 29/02/24 21:23, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:32:02PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 10/01/24 15:23, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: >>> Describe in each CPU node the regulator supplying it. >>> >>> Fixes: 260c04d425eb ("arm64: dts: mediatek: cherry: Enable MT6315 regulators on SPMI bus") >>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado >>> >> >> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > > Hello, > > looks like this patch was never picked up, while the cpufreq part has been > merged for a while, so I'm still getting the mentioned hangs on linux-next. > Could this be queued? :) > > Thanks, > Nícolas Will send that on the next -fixes round. Thanks for the reminder.