From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA37C28374; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708592938; cv=none; b=dAx+x6TeKfLSg5M/xi0+Hg9y8OMVLRBkW5YjMtMbMiHM9MJeFjK2XsqIcaYFKIx+Nasaw5UOVmYWCPKUYbaTqTrWNHYFuJHfnpdIpwbz+JhTFAZMS+7EIjsVeBmQLXxIxE+kKdzV+0M3Opv+JjU4EXkikIlBCWV/T6J4zOcCoEs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708592938; c=relaxed/simple; bh=THqwlQyNkUJ73BiKbiScBMvS2NWzpmFqOLtTdzDigyY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=hM5hXscZwJwLtcOhLovWQJ5FJNOmJEw1kEmv/2dE+lLMRtdbrVxhdXcFbMkyIrpWa6PBffmUndKlJ9PqX7HisJPkkNqZ0gWRycDPEqZycYgvYDQM7BBtvp4RR/f37Jdqxtw8n+iOR/vkd2/i8GLCDQKLuKHOw9ssOHD1Iil2LdU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TgS4C13mBz4f3lgQ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:08:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C56F1A0232; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:08:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgAX6REhD9dlhGAmEw--.45988S3; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:08:50 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH md-6.9 00/10] md/raid1: refactor read_balance() and some minor fix To: Paul Menzel , Kuai Yu , Paul E Luse Cc: song@kernel.org, neilb@suse.com, shli@fb.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" References: <20240222075806.1816400-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <34b04a5f-7ef8-4e00-b1c6-c4e692281499@molgen.mpg.de> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: <0f2a89e7-fa2c-fe83-bcb7-cfc449c5a721@huaweicloud.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:08:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <34b04a5f-7ef8-4e00-b1c6-c4e692281499@molgen.mpg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:cCh0CgAX6REhD9dlhGAmEw--.45988S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYk7AC8VAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E 6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28Cjx kF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8I cVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2js IEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE 5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeV CFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lFIxG xcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrw CFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE 14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxK x2IYs7xG6rWUJVWrZr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxV AFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUF9a9DUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ Hi, 在 2024/02/22 16:40, Paul Menzel 写道: > Is there a change in performance with the current patch set? Is radi1 > well enough covered by the test suite? Yes, there are no performance degradation, and mdadm tests passed. And Paul Luse also ran fio mixed workload w/data integrity and it passes. Thanks, Kuai