From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D778FC1975A for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 03:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E29120724 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 03:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=zytor.com header.i=@zytor.com header.b="pEnsu4NT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727317AbgCYDbX (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:31:23 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.136]:48455 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727285AbgCYDbX (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 23:31:23 -0400 Received: from hanvin-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (jfdmzpr04-ext.jf.intel.com [134.134.137.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 02P3Ux0G3339745 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:31:00 -0700 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.zytor.com 02P3Ux0G3339745 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zytor.com; s=2020032201; t=1585107061; bh=Knm646lHXwlpT0sefOB8j/QUNfPkjACyujqtgJGoOBM=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pEnsu4NTAVl61kfywRqIK5Du3Pg5RTHz17RBMkj0+1rxaQGZ23dJp7cWeND6eObJ2 BTBYIsTXqRzwiq+TeVqTQ6jnPyfXTjzTzwSVjPMjCo2Ff8vk5eSK1GPIiflqa0jvH+ N84bJBfc90yERWn6CcYhD5oeQey6ga3zM2aOvOuirqLe+iEgSvZgic8mOlqXRPsIKz Bn7+TIbrnx/12LoZ/ZqKM/QmbpXjqS7gj6ACiROzyOr18UB7CXcaFMuUd1uP2SRD/i bxUO627vgsuFSTDJscjsppYZS3VXcdP9ZopJ59y1NdaAWZ0w+gNgVHLV1VLdwVqefR aIPSKUfzu16GQ== Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86 support for the initrd= command line option To: ron minnich Cc: Matthew Garrett , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." , lkml - Kernel Mailing List References: <8E80838A-7A3F-4600-AF58-923EDA3DE91D@zytor.com> From: "H. Peter Anvin" Message-ID: <0f31f437-c644-210c-8dc9-22630ab9bd0d@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:30:54 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-03-23 15:29, ron minnich wrote: > sounds good, I'm inclined to want to mention only initrdmem= in > Documentation? or just say initrd is discouraged or deprecated? Deprecated, yes. -hpa