From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"Roman Kagan" <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: don't announce KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS when it is unavailable
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:29:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f3650ef-6a64-b6ab-5370-92e7c4d6cce1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190828075905.24744-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
On 28/08/19 09:59, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> It was discovered that hyperv_cpuid test now fails on AMD as it tries to
> enable KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS which is (wrongfully) reported as
> available.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - This is a v2 for '[PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: fix a couple of issues with
> Enlightened VMCS enablement' renamed as the first patch of the series
> was already merged.
> - Added Jim's Reviewed-by: to PATCH1
> - Added missing break in PATCH2 [Jim Mattson, Sean Christopherson]
>
> Vitaly Kuznetsov (2):
> KVM: x86: svm: remove unneeded nested_enable_evmcs() hook
> KVM: x86: announce KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS support only when
> it is available
>
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 9 +--------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-28 7:59 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-28 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: svm: remove unneeded nested_enable_evmcs() hook Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-28 7:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: announce KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS support only when it is available Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-28 16:24 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-17 13:29 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f3650ef-6a64-b6ab-5370-92e7c4d6cce1@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®