From: Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Aniket Limaye <a-limaye@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <mranostay@ti.com>,
<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<kristo@kernel.org>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Fix register map for main domain pmx
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:56:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f3764c4-22c5-4839-a541-8c333f5c2c6d@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829183155.dpaia4koseebgmdm@sudoku>
On 8/29/24 13:31, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 12:42-20240829, Aniket Limaye wrote:
>> From: Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@ti.com>
>>
>> Commit 0d0a0b441346 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: fix main pinmux
>> range") split the main_pmx0 into two nodes: main_pmx0 and main_pmx1
>> due to a non-addressable region, but incorrectly represented the
>> ranges. As a result, the memory map for the pinctrl is incorrect. Fix
>> this by introducing the correct ranges.
>>
>> The ranges are taken from the J7200 TRM (Table 5-695. CTRL_MMR0
>> Registers). Padconfig registers stretch from 0x11c000 to 0x11c168
>> with non-addressable portions from 0x11c10c to 0x11c10f, 0x11x114 to
>> 0x11c11b, and 0x11c128 to 0x11c163.
>>
>> Link: https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruiu1c/spruiu1c.pdf (TRM)
> Use the canonical link that redirects to the latest document such as https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruiu1
>
> older versions of the TRM may not be retained in ti.com
Thank you, will do.
>> Fixes: 0d0a0b441346 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: fix main pinmux range")
>> Signed-off-by: Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aniket Limaye <a-limaye@ti.com>
>> ---
>> .../dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi | 22 +++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>> index 6593c5da82c0..df39f2b1ff6b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ J721E_IOPAD(0x38, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (Y21) MCAN3_TX */
>> };
>> };
>>
>> -&main_pmx1 {
>> +&main_pmx2 {
>> main_usbss0_pins_default: main-usbss0-default-pins {
>> pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> J721E_IOPAD(0x04, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (T4) USB0_DRVVBUS */
> How is this change correct if you are changing the base from 0x1c to
> 0x10 (previously it was pointing to 0x20, now to 0x14? what is the
> correct offset of USB0_DRVBUS pin?)
The base hasn't changed because it's switched to main_pmx2
instead of main_pmx1. main_pmx2 is the same address range as the
original main_pmx1. I agree that this should be explained in the
commit message/diffstat.
> Did you do an audit of all offsets of main_pmx2 and 3 and resultant
> address split up (including overlays if applicable)?
All current pinmuxing for J7200's dts and dtso files is within the
main_pmx0, except for the USB0_DRVBUS pin. Since the address range for
main_pmx0 has not changed, there are no other changes that need to be
made.
> Explain that in commit message / diffstat as appropriate
I agree that this should be written out in a commit message /
diffstat. Perhaps it should also be a separate patch within the same
series.
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
>> index 9386bf3ef9f6..41adfa64418d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
> [...]
>
--
Best,
Jared McArthur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 7:12 Aniket Limaye
2024-08-29 18:31 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-29 19:56 ` Jared McArthur [this message]
2024-08-29 19:32 ` Jared McArthur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f3764c4-22c5-4839-a541-8c333f5c2c6d@ti.com \
--to=j-mcarthur@ti.com \
--cc=a-limaye@ti.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mranostay@ti.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®