From: Aditya Kumar Singh <aditya.kumar.singh@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ath-next v3] wifi: ath12k: avoid deadlock during regulatory update in ath12k_regd_update()
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:21:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f52f9ab-1696-42a1-b673-96c60f757361@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408-rtnl-deadlock-v3-1-fdc12bc511ea@quicinc.com>
On 4/8/2025 11:09 AM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
> From: Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>
>
> Running this test in a loop it is easy to reproduce an rtnl deadlock:
>
> iw reg set FI
> ifconfig wlan0 down
>
> What happens is that thread A (workqueue) tries to update the regulatory:
>
> try to acquire the rtnl_lock of ar->regd_update_work
>
> rtnl_lock
> ath12k_regd_update [ath12k]
> ath12k_regd_update_work [ath12k]
> process_one_work
> worker_thread
> kthread
> ret_from_fork
>
> And thread B (ifconfig) tries to stop the interface:
>
> try to cancel_work_sync(&ar->regd_update_work) in ath12k_mac_op_stop().
> ifconfig 3109 [003] 2414.232506: probe:
>
> ath12k_mac_op_stop [ath12k]
> drv_stop [mac80211]
> ieee80211_do_stop [mac80211]
> ieee80211_stop [mac80211]
>
> The sequence of deadlock is:
>
> 1. Thread B calls rtnl_lock().
>
> 2. Thread A starts to run and calls rtnl_lock() from within
> ath12k_regd_update_work(), then enters wait state because the lock is
> owned by thread B.
>
> 3. Thread B tries to call cancel_work_sync(&ar->regd_update_work), but
> thread A is in ath12k_regd_update_work() waiting for rtnl_lock(). So
> cancel_work_sync() forever waits for ath12k_regd_update_work() to
> finish and we have a deadlock.
>
> Change to use regulatory_set_wiphy_regd(), which is the asynchronous
> version of regulatory_set_wiphy_regd_sync(). This way rtnl & wiphy locks
> are not required so can be removed, and in the end the deadlock issue can
> be avoided.
>
> But a side effect introduced by the asynchronous regd update is that,
> some essential information used in ath12k_reg_update_chan_list(), which
> would be called later in ath12k_regd_update(), might has not been updated
> by cfg80211, as a result wrong channel parameters sent to firmware.
>
> To handle this side effect, move ath12k_reg_update_chan_list() to
> ath12k_reg_notifier(), and advertise WIPHY_FLAG_NOTIFY_REGDOM_BY_DRIVER
> to cfg80211. This works because, in the process of the asynchronous regd
> update, after the new regd is processed, cfg80211 will notify ath12k by
> calling ath12k_reg_notifier(). Since all essential information is updated
> at that time, we are good to do channel list update.
>
> Please note ath12k_reg_notifier() could also be called due to other
> reasons, like core/beacon/user hints etc. For them we are not allowed to
> call ath12k_reg_update_chan_list() because regd has not been updated.
> This is done by verifying the initiator.
>
> Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
> Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Aditya Kumar Singh <aditya.kumar.singh@oss.qualcomm.com>
--
Aditya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 5:39 Baochen Qiang
2025-04-17 4:51 ` Aditya Kumar Singh [this message]
2025-04-17 22:57 ` Jeff Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f52f9ab-1696-42a1-b673-96c60f757361@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=aditya.kumar.singh@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_bqiang@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_wgong@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®