Re: [PATCH 2/5] hp-bioscfg: Fix memory leaks in ordered_list_elements_from_package

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>]

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:35:35AM -0500, Jorge Lopez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:16 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:03:42AM -0500, Jorge Lopez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 1:21 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >    134          int value_len = 0;
> > > >    135          int ret;
> > > >    136          u32 size;
> > > >    137          u32 int_value = 0;
> > > >
> > > > It confused me that it's called int_value when it's not an int.  Just
> > > > call it "u32 value = 0;".
> > >
> > > The variable is named int_value when it is not an int because it
> > > stores the value reported by ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER package.
> > > The variable will be renamed to  type_int_value;
> >
> > Eep!  That's even worse!  Just leave it as-is then.
> 
> Oops!  just send a new patch using type_int_value.  Should I change it back?

In order of preference for me, it's "value", "int_value", and
"type_int_value".  But it doesn't really matter.  I feel there were a
couple bugs like the size vs value_len and re-using the iterator.  You
have addressed the real problems so lets not worry about variable names.
Whatever you pick is fine.

regards,
dan carpenter