mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: daejun7.park@samsung.com, ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"huobean@gmail.com" <huobean@gmail.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix proper API to send HPB pre-request
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:28:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f9229c3c4c7859524411a47db96a3b53ac89c90.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211027223619epcms2p60bbc74c9ba9757c58709a99acd0892ff@epcms2p6>

On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 07:36 +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> This patch addresses the issue of using the wrong API to create a
> pre_request for HPB READ.
> HPB READ candidate that require a pre-request will try to allocate a
> pre-request only during request_timeout_ms (default: 0). Otherwise,
> it is
> passed as normal READ, so deadlock problem can be resolved.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 11 +++++------
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> index 02fb51ae8b25..3117bd47d762 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static int ufshpb_execute_pre_req(struct
> ufshpb_lu *hpb, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
>  				 read_id);
>  	rq->cmd_len = scsi_command_size(rq->cmd);
>  
> -	if (blk_insert_cloned_request(q, req) != BLK_STS_OK)
> -		return -EAGAIN;
> +	blk_execute_rq_nowait(NULL, req, true,
> ufshpb_pre_req_compl_fn);
>  
>  	hpb->stats.pre_req_cnt++;
>  
> @@ -2315,19 +2314,19 @@ struct attribute_group
> ufs_sysfs_hpb_param_group = {
>  static int ufshpb_pre_req_mempool_init(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>  {
>  	struct ufshpb_req *pre_req = NULL, *t;
> -	int qd = hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->queue_depth / 2;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hpb->lh_pre_req_free);
>  
> -	hpb->pre_req = kcalloc(qd, sizeof(struct ufshpb_req),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> -	hpb->throttle_pre_req = qd;
> +	hpb->pre_req = kcalloc(HPB_INFLIGHT_PRE_REQ, sizeof(struct
> ufshpb_req),
> +			       GFP_KERNEL);
> +	hpb->throttle_pre_req = HPB_INFLIGHT_PRE_REQ;
>  	hpb->num_inflight_pre_req = 0;
>  
>  	if (!hpb->pre_req)
>  		goto release_mem;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < qd; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < HPB_INFLIGHT_PRE_REQ; i++) {
>  		pre_req = hpb->pre_req + i;
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pre_req->list_req);
>  		pre_req->req = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
> index a79e07398970..411a6d625f53 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
>  #define HPB_RESET_REQ_RETRIES			10
>  #define HPB_MAP_REQ_RETRIES			5
>  #define HPB_REQUEUE_TIME_MS			0
> +#define HPB_INFLIGHT_PRE_REQ			4

If the block people are happy with this, then I'm OK with it, but it
doesn't look like you've solved the fanout deadlock problem because
this new mechanism is still going to allocate a new tag.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-28 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20211027223619epcms2p60bbc74c9ba9757c58709a99acd0892ff@epcms2p6>
2021-10-27 22:36 ` Daejun Park
2021-10-28  4:16   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 14:28   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2021-10-28 15:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 17:07       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 17:10         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-28 15:59     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 19:12       ` James Bottomley
2021-10-28 20:04         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-28 20:12           ` James Bottomley
     [not found]       ` <CGME20211027223619epcms2p60bbc74c9ba9757c58709a99acd0892ff@epcms2p8>
2021-10-28 21:20         ` Daejun Park
2021-10-28 15:22   ` James Bottomley
2021-10-29  1:32   ` Ming Lei
     [not found]   ` <CGME20211027223619epcms2p60bbc74c9ba9757c58709a99acd0892ff@epcms2p3>
2021-10-29  1:50     ` Daejun Park
2021-10-29  2:10       ` Ming Lei
     [not found]       ` <CGME20211027223619epcms2p60bbc74c9ba9757c58709a99acd0892ff@epcms2p4>
2021-10-29  2:50         ` Daejun Park
2021-10-29  3:14           ` Ming Lei
     [not found]           ` <CGME20211027223619epcms2p60bbc74c9ba9757c58709a99acd0892ff@epcms2p1>
2021-10-29  4:39             ` Daejun Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0f9229c3c4c7859524411a47db96a3b53ac89c90.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=huobean@gmail.com \
    --cc=keosung.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®