From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
To: "frank.li@vivo.com" <frank.li@vivo.com>,
"glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
"slava@dubeyko.com" <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] hfs: fix to update ctime after rename
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 16:33:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f96f555b85457d179f474718010e433498d563b.camel@ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250530081719.2430291-3-frank.li@vivo.com>
On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 02:17 -0600, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Similar to hfsplus, let's update file ctime after the rename operation
> in hfs_rename().
>
> W/O patch(xfstest generic/003):
>
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file1 first time
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file2
> +ERROR: access time has changed after modifying file1
> +ERROR: change time has not been updated after changing file1
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3 second time
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3 third time
>
> W/ patch(xfstest generic/003):
>
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file1 first time
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file2
> +ERROR: access time has changed after modifying file1
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3 second time
> +ERROR: access time has not been updated after accessing file3 third time
>
I still don't understand this comment. What does finally this patch fix?
Thanks,
Slava.
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com>
> ---
> fs/hfs/dir.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/dir.c b/fs/hfs/dir.c
> index 86a6b317b474..756ea7b895e2 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/dir.c
> @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ static int hfs_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir,
> struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *new_dir,
> struct dentry *new_dentry, unsigned int flags)
> {
> + struct inode *inode = d_inode(old_dentry);
> int res;
>
> if (flags & ~RENAME_NOREPLACE)
> @@ -296,14 +297,16 @@ static int hfs_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir,
> return res;
> }
>
> - res = hfs_cat_move(d_inode(old_dentry)->i_ino,
> - old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name,
> + res = hfs_cat_move(inode->i_ino, old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name,
> new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name);
> - if (!res)
> - hfs_cat_build_key(old_dir->i_sb,
> - (btree_key *)&HFS_I(d_inode(old_dentry))->cat_key,
> - new_dir->i_ino, &new_dentry->d_name);
> - return res;
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> +
> + hfs_cat_build_key(old_dir->i_sb, (btree_key *)&HFS_I(inode)->cat_key,
> + new_dir->i_ino, &new_dentry->d_name);
> + inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
> + mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> const struct file_operations hfs_dir_operations = {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-30 8:17 [PATCH v3 1/3] hfsplus: " Yangtao Li
2025-05-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] hfs: correct superblock flags Yangtao Li
2025-05-30 16:30 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-05-30 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] hfs: fix to update ctime after rename Yangtao Li
2025-05-30 16:33 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f96f555b85457d179f474718010e433498d563b.camel@ibm.com \
--to=slava.dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®