Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: libsas: delete sas port if expander discover failed

[John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>]

On 14/05/2019 12:37, Jason Yan wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/5/14 18:45, John Garry wrote:
>> On 14/05/2019 03:42, Jason Yan wrote:
>>> The sas_port(phy->port) allocated in sas_ex_discover_expander() will not
>>> be deleted when the expander failed to discover. This will cause
>>> resource leak and a further issue of kernel BUG like below:
>>>
>>> [159785.843156]  port-2:17:29: trying to add phy phy-2:17:29 fails: it's
>>> already part of another port
>>> [159785.852144] ------------[ cut here  ]------------
>>> [159785.856833] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:1086!
>>> [159785.863000] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
>>> [159785.867866] CPU: 39 PID: 16993 Comm: kworker/u96:2 Tainted: G
>>> W  OE     4.19.25-vhulk1901.1.0.h111.aarch64 #1
>>> [159785.878458] Hardware name: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
>>> Hi1620EVBCS/Hi1620EVBCS, BIOS Hi1620 CS B070 1P TA 03/21/2019
>>> [159785.889231] Workqueue: 0000:74:02.0_disco_q sas_discover_domain
>>> [159785.895224] pstate: 40c00009 (nZcv daif +PAN +UAO)
>>> [159785.900094] pc : sas_port_add_phy+0x188/0x1b8
>>> [159785.904524] lr : sas_port_add_phy+0x188/0x1b8
>>> [159785.908952] sp : ffff0001120e3b80
>>> [159785.912341] x29: ffff0001120e3b80 x28: 0000000000000000
>>> [159785.917727] x27: ffff802ade8f5400 x26: ffff0000681b7560
>>> [159785.923111] x25: ffff802adf11a800 x24: ffff0000680e8000
>>> [159785.928496] x23: ffff802ade8f5728 x22: ffff802ade8f5708
>>> [159785.933880] x21: ffff802adea2db40 x20: ffff802ade8f5400
>>> [159785.939264] x19: ffff802adea2d800 x18: 0000000000000010
>>> [159785.944649] x17: 00000000821bf734 x16: ffff00006714faa0
>>> [159785.950033] x15: ffff0000e8ab4ecf x14: 7261702079646165
>>> [159785.955417] x13: 726c612073277469 x12: ffff00006887b830
>>> [159785.960802] x11: ffff00006773eaa0 x10: 7968702079687020
>>> [159785.966186] x9 : 0000000000002453 x8 : 726f702072656874
>>> [159785.971570] x7 : 6f6e6120666f2074 x6 : ffff802bcfb21290
>>> [159785.976955] x5 : ffff802bcfb21290 x4 : 0000000000000000
>>> [159785.982339] x3 : ffff802bcfb298c8 x2 : 337752b234c2ab00
>>> [159785.987723] x1 : 337752b234c2ab00 x0 : 0000000000000000
>>> [159785.993108] Process kworker/u96:2 (pid: 16993, stack limit =
>>> 0x0000000072dae094)
>>> [159786.000576] Call trace:
>>> [159786.003097]  sas_port_add_phy+0x188/0x1b8
>>> [159786.007179]  sas_ex_get_linkrate.isra.5+0x134/0x140
>>> [159786.012130]  sas_ex_discover_expander+0x128/0x408
>>> [159786.016906]  sas_ex_discover_dev+0x218/0x4c8
>>> [159786.021249]  sas_ex_discover_devices+0x9c/0x1a8
>>> [159786.025852]  sas_discover_root_expander+0x134/0x160
>>> [159786.030802]  sas_discover_domain+0x1b8/0x1e8
>>> [159786.035148]  process_one_work+0x1b4/0x3f8
>>> [159786.039230]  worker_thread+0x54/0x470
>>> [159786.042967]  kthread+0x134/0x138
>>> [159786.046269]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>> [159786.049918] Code: 91322300 f0004402 91178042 97fe4c9b (d4210000)
>>> [159786.056083] Modules linked in: hns3_enet_ut(OE) hclge(OE) hnae3(OE)
>>> hisi_sas_test_hw(OE) hisi_sas_test_main(OE) serdes(OE)
>>> [159786.067202] ---[ end trace 03622b9e2d99e196  ]---
>>> [159786.071893] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>>> [159786.077190] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>>> [159786.081192] Kernel Offset: disabled
>>> [159786.084753] CPU features: 0x2,a2a00a38
>>>
>>> Fixes: 2908d778ab3e ("[SCSI] aic94xx: new driver")

Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>

>>> Reported-by: Jian Luo <luojian5@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
>>> CC: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>> index 83f2fd70ce76..9f7e2457360e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>> @@ -1019,6 +1019,8 @@ static struct domain_device
>>> *sas_ex_discover_expander(
>>>          list_del(&child->dev_list_node);
>>>          spin_unlock_irq(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
>>>          sas_put_device(child);
>>> +        sas_port_delete(phy->port);
>>> +        phy->port = NULL;
>>
>> This looks ok.
>>
>> However, I wonder if we miss something else, and I see this code
>> earlier in sas_ex_discover_expander():
>>
>>      kref_get(&parent->kref);
>>      child->parent = parent;
>>      child->port = port;
>>      child->iproto = phy->attached_iproto;
>>      child->tproto = phy->attached_tproto;
>>
>> I assume the kref get is for the child referencing the parent. Do we
>> need the kref put? I couldn't see it.
>>
>> If yes, maybe it should it go in sas_free_device(), along with kfree()
>> for expander device phys.
>>
>
> Yes, the parent's kref will put in sas_free_device(). So the call chain
> will be:
>
> sas_put_device
>   ->sas_free_device
>     ->sas_put_device(dev->parent);
>       ->kref_put
>

Ah, yes.

> Thanks,
> Jason
>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>>>          return NULL;
>>>      }
>>>      list_add_tail(&child->siblings, &parent->ex_dev.children);
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> .
>