From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser 4 - the BIG picture - (think BIG picture)
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:19:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <100071B4-0789-47C9-B3EF-F8E842F367B2@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509190855160.27719@shark.he.net>
On Sep 19, 2005, at 12:00:41, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
>> If Reiser 4 isn't ready then what specifically needs to be done to
>> get it ready? Let's post a list.
>>
>> How ready is Reiser 4 compared to other file systems at the point
>> of inclusion? Is it ripe yet?
>
> Review is the biggest thing that is needed now, and there aren't a
> huge number of qualified reviewers, so it's largely a resourcing
> issue.
>
> How do we get the qualified reviewers to review it & post their
> comments? They also have other things to do, so we can't expect
> them to drop their current activities and review it this week.
Especially since Hans has been providing strong disincentive to
review of his code. Personal attacks are not exactly productive
along those lines. Perhaps it might be best if the code reviewers
were to work directly with Vladimir Saveliev, Alexander Zarochentcev,
etc to get the issues resolved directly with minimal political
posturing. Hans, no offense, but you've been trying really hard to
get everybody qualified to review your code to reconsider such
action. Maybe you should step back and let the programmers work out
issues on their own.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible
-- Alan Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-19 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-19 15:45 Marc Perkel
2005-09-19 16:00 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-19 16:11 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2005-09-19 16:16 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-19 16:24 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2005-09-19 16:19 ` Kyle Moffett [this message]
2005-09-19 17:50 ` Marc Perkel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=100071B4-0789-47C9-B3EF-F8E842F367B2@mac.com \
--to=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@perkel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®