From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Rolf Fokkens <fokkensr@linux06.vertis.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpus_allowed
Date: 13 Oct 2001 12:22:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002990137.868.59.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01101316594000.02369@home01>
In-Reply-To: <01101316594000.02369@home01>
On Sat, 2001-10-13 at 19:59, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
> I was curious about "CPU affinity" in linux. I found some patches which add
> affinity in task_struct but later I found out that "cpus_allowed" in
> task_struct almost does the same thing.
>
> It resulted in some new curiosity: where's cpus_allowed initialized? I can
> only find an assignment to cpus_allowed for softirq's but no initialization
> for other processes. I assume the correct init value would be "0xffffffff" or
> -1. Can't find it though.
>
> I'm sure I'm overlooking something, but that doesn't help me finding the
> answer. So would someone be so kind to enlighten me?
It is initialized to -1 (0xffffffff) by struct definition at
linux/kernel/sched.h. Since it is a mask, this means all CPUs
(obviously).
It isn't used much. The softirq code uses it to try to keep some tasks
on one CPU, for performance reasons. The Tux in-kernel httpd uses it
for performance reasons. Some patches use it, too.
Most of the CPU affinity patches you see were written before
cpus_allowed. They go through all sorts of trouble to do what the OS
now does on its own. If you want to change CPU affinity then you just
need a patch that adds a syscall or proc interface for setting the
cpus_allowed mask.
I wrote a proc interface but for the life of me I can't find it. If you
can I would be happy to update it to your kernel. It isn't very old,
anyhow.
Andrew Morton wrote has a similar patch that is quite good. Get it at
http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/#cpus_allowed
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-13 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-13 23:59 cpus_allowed Rolf Fokkens
2001-10-13 16:22 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-10-13 16:14 ` cpus_allowed Tim Hockin
2001-10-14 0:37 ` cpus_allowed Rolf Fokkens
2001-10-13 16:23 ` cpus_allowed Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002990137.868.59.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=fokkensr@linux06.vertis.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®