From: "C. Linus Hicks" <lhicks@nc.rr.com>
To: Andreas.Franck@akustik.rwth-aachen.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.[10-13]-acX slows down to crawl...
Date: 07 Nov 2001 12:29:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1005154173.2537.37.camel@lh2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BE95E9C.D62D372C@akustik.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <3BE95E9C.D62D372C@akustik.rwth-aachen.de>
On 07 Nov 2001 17:17:32 +0100, Andreas Franck wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> since quite a time (it happens at least since 2.4.10-ac, and also
> happens with the newest -ac kernel 2.4.13-ac8), Linux gets slower
> and slower, to a state where it is basically unusable after some days.
> I suspect it is a VM issue, because it starts swapping without any
> need, not freeing buffers? The buffer sizes are about the size of RAM
> when it is worst. For anything done, the load goes up extremely, network
> access basically halts the machine then, leading to a load of about 20
> :-(
I did not look closely at what was happening, but I experienced a
similar slowdown on 2.4.9-ac11. It took a while in my case, (several
weeks) as I have 1gb memory and don't have any massive files on my
system. I have dual PIII 1GHz CPUs and was downloading a 300mb file when
I started xpdf on a document that has lots of complex drawaings. The
download rate was 200-250kbps prior to starting xpdf and dropped to
20-40. If I stopped the download and restarted, it ran at 200-250 until
I ran xpdf again (that it was running did not seem important, but when I
displayed a new page and it ate a CPU). I thought it might be something
with xpdf because I was able to reproduce an xpdf slowdown by running
three copies at the same time.
However, now I am running 2.4.12-ac6 booted last night and I have seen
the slowdown in xpdf running just one. Last night after I re-booted, it
was running fine. The strange thing is that when this happens, the
system acts like it has no spare CPU because even switching to another
window takes a long time for the focus to change.
top reports:
12:21pm up 11:36, 16 users, load average: 0.30, 0.13, 0.09
140 processes: 138 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states: 0.5% user, 0.4% system, 0.0% nice, 98.1% idle
CPU1 states: 99.3% user, 0.2% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% idle
Mem: 1028936K av, 817768K used, 211168K free, 4152K shrd, 282336K
buff
Swap: 2000880K av, 0K used, 2000880K free 189408K
cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
1117 root 18 0 75864 34M 5972 R 99.9 3.3 342:36 X
5491 linush 14 0 1016 1016 768 R 1.1 0.0 0:09 top
4859 linush 9 0 3544 3544 1616 S 0.5 0.3 0:04 xpdf
1 root 8 0 528 528 460 S 0.0 0.0 0:01 init
2 root 9 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd
Let me know if I can be of any assistance.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-07 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-07 16:17 Andreas Franck
2001-11-07 17:29 ` C. Linus Hicks [this message]
2001-11-07 17:49 ` David Lang
2001-11-08 17:10 ` Andreas Franck
2001-11-08 20:24 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1005154173.2537.37.camel@lh2 \
--to=lhicks@nc.rr.com \
--cc=Andreas.Franck@akustik.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®