Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] net: cadence: macb: sama7g5_emac: Remove USARIO CLKEN flag

[Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>]

On 29.07.2025 18:51, Ryan Wanner wrote:
> On 7/26/25 05:56, claudiu beznea wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know
>> the content is safe
>>
>> Hi, Ryan,
>>
>> On 7/21/25 18:39, Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com wrote:
>>> On 7/18/25 04:00, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
>>>> know the content is safe
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Ryan,
>>>>
>>>> On 14.07.2025 19:37, Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove USARIO_CLKEN flag since this is now a device tree argument and
>>>>
>>>> s/USARIO_CLKEN/USRIO_HAS_CLKEN here and in title as well.
>>>>
>>>>> not fixed to the SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> This will instead be selected by the "cdns,refclk-ext"
>>>>> device tree property.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 3 +--
>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/
>>>>> ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>>>>> index 51667263c01d..cd54e4065690 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>>>>> @@ -5113,8 +5113,7 @@ static const struct macb_config
>>>>> sama7g5_gem_config = {
>>>>>
>>>>>   static const struct macb_config sama7g5_emac_config = {
>>>>>        .caps = MACB_CAPS_USRIO_DEFAULT_IS_MII_GMII |
>>>>> -             MACB_CAPS_USRIO_HAS_CLKEN | MACB_CAPS_MIIONRGMII |
>>>>
>>>> Will old DTBs still work with new kernels with this change?
>>>
>>> That was my assumption, but it seems it would be safer to keep this
>>> property for this IP and implement this dt flag property on IPs that do
>>> not already have  MACB_CAPS_USRIO_HAS_CLKEN property.
>>
>> So, this patch should be reverted, right?
> 
> Yes you are right, more testing I see that this could break older DTs. I
> am new to reverting patches, do I send a patch to revert this and would
> it be an issue now?

Not sure about the approach now! Looks like this has already been merged
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250727013451.2436467-1-kuba@kernel.org/

Thank you,
Claudiu

> 
> Ryan
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Claudiu
>>
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Claudiu
>>>>
>>>>> -             MACB_CAPS_GEM_HAS_PTP,
>>>>> +             MACB_CAPS_MIIONRGMII | MACB_CAPS_GEM_HAS_PTP,
>>>>>        .dma_burst_length = 16,
>>>>>        .clk_init = macb_clk_init,
>>>>>        .init = macb_init,
>>>>
>>>
>>
>