From: Brian Beattie <alchemy@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Mario Mikocevic <mozgy@hinet.hr>,
Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FC & MULTIPATH !? (any hope?)
Date: 14 Jan 2002 11:53:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1011037987.918.0.camel@w-beattie1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200201141524.g0EFOqj09542@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <200201141524.g0EFOqj09542@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 07:24, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > is there any hope of working combination of MULTIPATH with FC !?
> >
> > Yes. QLogic's newest 2200 HBA can do that. I don't know whether that is a
> > possible solution for your problem though.
>
> To clarify: This solution is being pushed by IBM. Unless you have a FASt
> array, you may not get help making it work from either IBM or Qlogic. You
> also need the 5.x qlogic driver which you can download from the IBM website
> (or from SuSE 7.3).
>
> > At the moment I am using raid option multipath but it's one way
> > street, when one FC connection dies it successfully switches onto
> > another FC connection but when that second dies aswell, mount point is
> > in a limbo, no switching back to first FC connection.
>
> I've tested the qlogic and it will switch to the secondary and back again on a
> FASt 200 HA.
>
> Although it was designed to work with the LSI Symplicity-4 AVT technology
> (which is what IBM FASt's OEM), there's a high degree of probability that it
> will also work with any array that the MD multipath driver also works for, so
> good luck.
>
I've been working with the multipath code. Trying to add functionality
to it. While I have not yet looked at this particular issue, if there
is interest I would be willing to see what can be done. I do not think
it would be a big deal to add the functionality to reactivate a dead
path. It should not be too hard to attempt to do so automatically.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-14 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-14 15:24 James Bottomley
2002-01-14 16:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-01-14 19:53 ` Brian Beattie [this message]
2002-01-14 20:11 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-14 11:33 Mario Mikocevic
2002-01-14 12:07 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-01-14 16:21 ` Peter Rival
2002-01-17 23:36 ` Brian Beattie
2002-01-18 7:07 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-01-18 22:30 ` Brian Beattie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1011037987.918.0.camel@w-beattie1 \
--to=alchemy@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=mozgy@hinet.hr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®