From: Chris Chabot <chabotc@reviewboard.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: AOL in Negotiations to Buy Red Hat?
Date: 19 Jan 2002 23:43:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1011480218.1391.4.camel@gandbook.chabotc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020119223029.GA1690@home.parts-unknown.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0201190032090.8490-100000@localhost.localdomain> <20020119223029.GA1690@home.parts-unknown.org>
I think the main conclusion to be drawn here, is that the reporter who
covered this news, is a bit clueless when it comes to high-tech
situations. I remeber reading in the article that "...Sony Corp.'s
PlayStation 2 video-game console. Linux also runs the Sony product"
Ofoucrce, i think he ment that you can linux on the sony playstation.
Anyways, gues we better get used to those types of proclamations,when
the millions of aol users start running linux <grin>
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 23:30, David Benfell wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 00:45:36 -0500, Werner Puschitz wrote:
> >
> > http://www.washtech.com/news/media/14759-1.html
> >
> Forgive the mind-numbing question but, it says, "But the AOL software
> could be configured to override Windows and launch a version of Red
> Hat's Linux operating system, sources said."
>
> Now, my idea of overriding Windows is blowing it away, or at least
> making the system dual-boot. I'm having trouble reconciling the
> concepts. Can anyone shed some light?
>
> --
> David Benfell
> benfell@parts-unknown.org
> ---
> There's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to.
> [from fortune]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-19 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-19 5:45 Werner Puschitz
2002-01-19 8:50 ` Pagani, Ronald
2002-01-19 23:44 ` robert w hall
2002-01-21 6:32 ` M A
2002-01-21 16:35 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-21 20:06 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2002-01-21 21:15 ` Xavier Bestel
2002-01-21 20:53 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-19 22:30 ` [OT] " David Benfell
2002-01-19 22:42 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2002-01-19 22:52 ` Mark Hahn
2002-01-20 0:34 ` Nicholas Knight
2002-01-19 22:43 ` Chris Chabot [this message]
2002-01-20 0:15 ` Ian S. Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1011480218.1391.4.camel@gandbook.chabotc.com \
--to=chabotc@reviewboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome