mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: John Weber <weber@nyc.rr.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.4 Compile Error
Date: 11 Feb 2002 01:20:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1013408447.806.409.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C675E6B.4010605@nyc.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C674CFA.2030107@nyc.rr.com> <3C6750CD.46575DAA@mandrakesoft.com>  <3C675E6B.4010605@nyc.rr.com>

On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 01:02, John Weber wrote:

> The function thread_saved_pc() is a mystery to me.  It is declared with 
> a return type of unsigned long, and yet return this:
> 
> ((unsigned long *)tsk->thread->esp)[3]
> 
> This is confusing to me in many ways:
> - the "thread" member of task struct is not a pointer
> - esp is of type unsigned long, so I don't understand the cast, and
> I certainly don't understand the [3] here.
> 
> Can anyone explain this code to me?

The problem is an interdependency between processor.h and sched.h.

The old code was the same, except it did

	t->esp

where t was a thread_struct, instead of what we do now

	t->thread->esp

where t is a task_struct.  And thus whereby before we passed

	p->thread

as the argument, now you pass just `p'.  I.e., its the same net-affect. 
The error is because the function needs access to both task_struct (in
sched.h) and thread_struct (in processor.h) but the two are interrelated
so we can't include them in each other.

The contents of esp is a memory address, so typecasting it to (unsigned
long *) is OK.

As for the [3], p[3] is the same as
	*(p+3)
ie,
	*(p+sizeof(p))
so that is legal.

So the fix, aside from reverting this change and the kernel/sched.c
change and the sparc64 changes ... would be to solve the dependency
issue.

	Robert Love


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-11  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-11  4:47 John Weber
2002-02-11  5:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-11  6:02   ` John Weber
2002-02-11  6:29     ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-11  6:33     ` David S. Miller
2002-02-11  6:48       ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-11  6:52       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-11  6:20   ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-02-11  6:36     ` John Weber
2002-02-11  6:50     ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 15:50     ` Pascal Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1013408447.806.409.camel@phantasy \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weber@nyc.rr.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®