From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: John Weber <weber@nyc.rr.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.4 Compile Error
Date: 11 Feb 2002 01:20:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1013408447.806.409.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C675E6B.4010605@nyc.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C674CFA.2030107@nyc.rr.com> <3C6750CD.46575DAA@mandrakesoft.com> <3C675E6B.4010605@nyc.rr.com>
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 01:02, John Weber wrote:
> The function thread_saved_pc() is a mystery to me. It is declared with
> a return type of unsigned long, and yet return this:
>
> ((unsigned long *)tsk->thread->esp)[3]
>
> This is confusing to me in many ways:
> - the "thread" member of task struct is not a pointer
> - esp is of type unsigned long, so I don't understand the cast, and
> I certainly don't understand the [3] here.
>
> Can anyone explain this code to me?
The problem is an interdependency between processor.h and sched.h.
The old code was the same, except it did
t->esp
where t was a thread_struct, instead of what we do now
t->thread->esp
where t is a task_struct. And thus whereby before we passed
p->thread
as the argument, now you pass just `p'. I.e., its the same net-affect.
The error is because the function needs access to both task_struct (in
sched.h) and thread_struct (in processor.h) but the two are interrelated
so we can't include them in each other.
The contents of esp is a memory address, so typecasting it to (unsigned
long *) is OK.
As for the [3], p[3] is the same as
*(p+3)
ie,
*(p+sizeof(p))
so that is legal.
So the fix, aside from reverting this change and the kernel/sched.c
change and the sparc64 changes ... would be to solve the dependency
issue.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-11 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-11 4:47 John Weber
2002-02-11 5:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-11 6:02 ` John Weber
2002-02-11 6:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-11 6:33 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-11 6:48 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-11 6:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-11 6:20 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-02-11 6:36 ` John Weber
2002-02-11 6:50 ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 15:50 ` Pascal Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1013408447.806.409.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weber@nyc.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®