From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:49:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:49:17 -0500 Received: from tolkor.sgi.com ([192.48.180.13]:43240 "EHLO tolkor.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:49:08 -0500 Subject: Re: linux-2.5.5-xfs-dj1 troubles (raid0_make_request bug) From: Steve Lord To: svetljo Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux Kernel , Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <3C7B6FDE.4090308@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> In-Reply-To: <3C7B6FDE.4090308@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 26 Feb 2002 09:44:42 -0600 Message-Id: <1014738282.5993.2.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 05:22, svetljo wrote: > Hi > i'd like to ask you to CC me because i'm not subscribed to the lists > > i'm having some interesting troubles > i have lvm over soft RAID-0 with LV's formated with XFS and JFS > i can work with the JFS LV's, > but i can not with the XFS one's, i can not mount them ( no troubles > with XFS normal partitions) > > so > i'd like to ask is this problem with XFS or with raid or lvm > and is there a way to fix it > > thanks for your help > > here is what i found in dmesg > > > XFS mounting filesystem lvm(58,2) > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than > 16k 8323317 64 > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than > 16k 8323445 64 > I/O error in filesystem ("lvm(58,2)") meta-data dev 0xc0223a02 block > 0x601f7d > ("xlog_bread") error 5 buf count 131072 > raid0_make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than > 16k 8324829 29 > I/O error in filesystem ("lvm(58,2)") meta-data dev 0xc0223a02 block > 0x602565 > ("xlog_bread") error 5 buf count 30208 XFS is sending a 64K request down to the driver, and raid0 is bouncing it as too large. Jens, I thought you said requests which were too large for underlying layers would get chopped up? Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@sgi.com