From: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
To: Etienne Lorrain <etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] delayed disk block allocation
Date: 07 Mar 2002 08:47:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1015512444.1293.14.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020307120609.85742.qmail@web11804.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020307120609.85742.qmail@web11804.mail.yahoo.com>
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 06:06, Etienne Lorrain wrote:
> > With "allocate on flush", (aka delayed allocation), file data is
> > assigned a disk mapping when the data is being written out, rather than
> > at write(2) time. This has the following advantages:
>
> I do agree that this is a better solution than current one,
> but (even if I did not had time to test the patch), I have
> a question: How about bootloaders?
>
> IHMO all current bootloaders need to write to disk a "chain" of sector
> to load for their own initialisation, i.e. loading the remainning
> part of code stored on a file in one filesystem from the 512 bytes
> bootcode. This "chain" of sector can only be known once the file
> has been allocated to disk - and it has to be written on the same file,
> at its allocated space.
>
> So can you upgrade LILO or GRUB with your patch installed?
> It is not a so big problem (the solution being to install the
> bootloader on an unmounted filesystem with tools like e2fsprogs),
> but it seems incompatible with the current executables.
The interface used by lilo to read the kernel location needs to flush
data out to disk before returning results. It's not too hard to do.
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-07 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-07 12:06 Etienne Lorrain
2002-03-07 14:47 ` Steve Lord [this message]
2002-03-07 17:30 ` Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-04 14:54 rwhron
2002-03-04 15:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-01 8:26 Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 2:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-04 3:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-04 7:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 5:04 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 5:31 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04 5:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 6:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04 5:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-04 6:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04 15:02 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-06 12:59 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-04 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 8:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-04 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 9:23 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1015512444.1293.14.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com \
--to=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®