From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S312328AbSCUAwa>; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:52:30 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S312327AbSCUAwV>; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:52:21 -0500
Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:15371 "EHLO zero.tech9.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S312326AbSCUAwK>;
	Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:52:10 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4: BUG_ON (2/2)
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <E16nqci-0003ra-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.2.99 Preview Release
Date: 20 Mar 2002 19:52:16 -0500
Message-Id: <1016671937.15333.292.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 19:40, Alan Cox wrote:

> Can we get Andrew's "oh look my kernel is 100Kb smaller" changes in first,
> there are some clashes here and I think the 100K one is more important
> personally 8)

If we must. :)

	Robert Love