From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEE3C433DF for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE5A2078A for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=skogtun.org header.i=@skogtun.org header.b="XaNuR/x+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727107AbgHZUoW (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:44:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60982 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726740AbgHZUoR (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:44:17 -0400 Received: from smtp.domeneshop.no (smtp.domeneshop.no [IPv6:2a01:5b40:0:3005::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9597C061574 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:44:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skogtun.org ; s=ds201912; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=81QOHKG8nskBo8noIVLaJnv+JFBD/ZOyIUZnyD6RVw0=; b=XaNuR/x+4X9LjePdzfMotUT3X8 ordHvCiA1DEzi76Fzz0iiCngJfWoTzSKo9q/7M5ETM/tChFVtvYy4d5QQR5AFxyeSB4LfHhmwDPiv D6/hHyUV+qACpv3c9tY7fgRmNA2PgQ9VDnVpkKdYxoRmW7nXFz8DpkfD9b4ORLBUcPPZQUNRgMnG9 D3Iwh2OQ1M7qNX9mRI03ELFfToCiMzpDBfrWOq0DiNzAvOVaIraFkfIMu9uwEBGAgQR1EgN8hSARl I/12rWQWUm4enWjjRD398PqSgVTVNU/pPfLGo3cY0jsQ9IrYt8GhNpBFmaq8l8aTJRKhRxQ3PqKx5 aTSErK8g==; Received: from [2a01:79c:cebf:7fb0:de97:df61:fecc:46bb] (port=56236) by smtp.domeneshop.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kB2HG-00075B-Qd; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:44:14 +0200 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jani Nikula , Pavel Machek , Dave Airlie , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Daniel Vetter , Chris Wilson , Matthew Auld , intel-gfx , kernel list References: <20200817161132.GA4711@amd> <20200820092349.GA3792@amd> <20200821091900.hzbivycs5ky5d3iw@duo.ucw.cz> <87tuwr59te.fsf@intel.com> <7efa547d-b7a4-b873-f1aa-4f19eb849fa3@skogtun.org> <656b8f9f-d696-c75d-aef6-2b8b5170f2f6@skogtun.org> From: Harald Arnesen Message-ID: <101bff45-0ebd-8fb6-7c99-963aa4fcc588@skogtun.org> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:44:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds [26.08.2020 20:04]: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:30 AM Harald Arnesen wrote: >> Somehow related to lightdm or xfce4? However, it is a regression, since >> kernel 5.8 works. > Yeah, apparently there's something else wrong with the relocation changes too. > > That said, does that patch at > > https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20200821123746.16904-1-joro@8bytes.org/ > > change things at all? If there are two independent bugs, maybe > applying that patch might at least give you an oops that gets saved in > the logs? > > (it might be worth waiting a bit after the machine locks up in case > the machine is alive enough so sync logs after a bit.. If ssh works, > that's obviously better yet) No, doesn't help. And I was wrong, ssh does not work at all when the display locks up. -- Hilsen Harald