From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 01:13:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 01:13:09 -0400 Received: from graze.net ([65.207.24.2]:48063 "EHLO graze.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 01:13:09 -0400 Subject: Re: Changelogs on kernel.org From: "Brian C. Huffman" To: john slee Cc: Ian Molton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020512010959.GH3855@higherplane.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 12 May 2002 01:05:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1021179952.28117.4.camel@zaphod.graze.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Generally the defense that "no one else is saying anything" is not a good one - especially b/c it opens up a huge space for others to agree with the original argument. And yes, they are illegible. In fact, I believe that when things originally moved to BK, there was some discussion that although it was a step in the right direction, it needed to be cleaned up a little bit. -Brian On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 21:09, john slee wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:09AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: > > I dont know who to write to about this, but the changelogs for > > 2.4.19-pre on kernel.org are COMPLETELY illegible. > > you seem to be the only one publicly complaining. go write a procmail > recipe to fix them up. >