From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:05:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:05:29 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:47610 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 19:05:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4-ac: more scheduler updates (1/3) From: Robert Love To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020520225858.GA1792@werewolf.able.es> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 20 May 2002 16:03:37 -0700 Message-Id: <1021935821.958.1.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 15:58, J.A. Magallon wrote: > On 2002.05.20 Robert Love wrote: > > > - remove the RUN_CHILD_FIRST cruft from kernel/fork.c. > > Pretty clear this works great; we do not need the ifdefs. > > AFAIR, there was a problem with bash, I think. > Is it corrected ? I thought that was with the stock-scheduler when child-runs-first was hacked into it? As far as I know, it has always worked right in the O(1) scheduler. If not, it still is not a kernel issue and no one is using these defines anyhow - they just muck up the code. Robert Love