From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:54:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:54:07 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:9212 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 12:54:06 -0400 Subject: Re: Compiling 2.2.19 with -O3 flag From: Robert Love To: Marcus Meissner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200205241645.g4OGjbE30934@ns.caldera.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 24 May 2002 09:54:04 -0700 Message-Id: <1022259244.2638.243.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 09:45, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > Heh, now that is interesting. > > Not really, -Os implies -O2, cf gcc/toplev.c: Well, according to Alan -Os outperforms -O2. So either the code is smaller _and_ faster - and that is surely interesting - or the code is _not_ smaller and -Os is a misnomer. Seems interesting to me. Robert Love