mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Adam J. Richter" <adam@freya.yggdrasil.com>
Cc: gilad@benyossef.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lm@bitmover.com, phillips@bonn-fries.net
Subject: Re: business models [was patent stuff]
Date: 28 May 2002 19:22:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1022610136.4124.131.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205281713.KAA22774@freya.yggdrasil.com>

On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 18:13, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> 	You could license all programs that consist entirely of
> free software.  That way, BSD, LGPL, and MPL software that did
> not link in proprietary software would be allowed too, but your
> example of a proprietary program that linked in the BSD'ed
> libpatent.o/c would not be covered by this permission.

Define "free software" using only legally defined phrases which have
precedent. In fact put four people in a room and get them to define free
software.

> software would address issues like GPL'ed software that contains
> content that is GPL compatible but not GPL'ed, future versions of

If its linked then it is GPL in the linked form, otherwise you wouldn't
be allowed to link it

Alan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-05-28 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-28 17:13 Adam J. Richter
2002-05-28 17:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-28 18:22 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2002-05-28 17:23   ` Andre Hedrick
2002-05-29 21:44   ` David Weinehall
2002-05-30  4:51     ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-29 19:13 Adam J. Richter
2002-05-29  3:21 Adam J. Richter
2002-05-29 13:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 14:13   ` Jonathan Corbet
2002-05-29 16:15     ` Jamie Lokier
2002-05-29 17:29       ` Nicholas Knight
2002-05-31 20:17         ` Perry The Cynic
2002-06-03 10:49   ` Rob Landley
     [not found] <50.c105234.2a24c92d@aol.com>
2002-05-28 13:42 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2002-05-27 21:52 patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)] Adam J. Richter
2002-05-27 22:24 ` business models [was patent stuff] Larry McVoy
2002-05-27 23:15   ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-05-27 23:31     ` Austin Gonyou
2002-05-28  9:29     ` Peter Wächtler
2002-05-28 13:46       ` Mark Mielke
2002-05-29  8:34         ` Peter Wächtler
2002-05-28  7:53   ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2002-05-28  8:57     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-28 11:30       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-28 10:32   ` Ingo Oeser
2002-05-28 12:28   ` Jonathan Corbet
2002-05-28 18:35   ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1022610136.4124.131.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=adam@freya.yggdrasil.com \
    --cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®