mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Sailer <sailer@scs.ch>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc1-ac3
Date: 15 Jul 2002 12:13:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1026728020.2365.23.camel@watermelon.scs.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020713205422.E25995@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 21:54, Russell King wrote:

> You're right if your CPU usage is 100% - lowering the CPU clock rate
> means you take longer to complete the task, and with the static
> element of the CPU power consumption, you'd probably end up using
> more energy to perform the same task in a longer time.

The point is that frequency scaling is normally used with voltage
scaling. And lowering the voltage decreases the maximum frequency
roughly linearly, while the dynamic power consumption decreases
quadratically with voltage.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-15 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-12 19:14 Alan Cox
2002-07-12 23:42 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-13  7:41   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-07-13 10:34     ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-13 12:38       ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-07-13 16:22         ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-13 18:27           ` Alan Cox
2002-07-13 19:43             ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-13 19:54               ` Russell King
2002-07-13 20:56                 ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-15 10:13                 ` Thomas Sailer [this message]
2002-07-15 10:16                   ` Russell King
2002-07-14  1:50               ` Alan Cox
     [not found]               ` <6010.1026651788@www53.gmx.net>
2002-07-14 13:09                 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-07-14 15:19                   ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-14 15:50                     ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-07-14 18:52                       ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-13 10:25   ` Peter Osterlund
2002-07-13 14:15 ` Pavel Machek
2002-07-13 17:09   ` Alan Cox
2002-07-13 15:59 ` fchabaud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1026728020.2365.23.camel@watermelon.scs.ch \
    --to=sailer@scs.ch \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®