From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:44:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:44:36 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:751 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:44:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6] Most likely to be merged by Halloween... THE LIST From: Alan Cox To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Joe Thornber , Guillaume Boissiere , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <3D361091.13618.16DC46FB@localhost> <1027357077.31782.50.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 22 Jul 2002 19:00:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1027360827.32299.64.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 17:45, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > So we end up with twice as much code to debug and lots of > > incompatibilities when people want to switch around. > > If that were a problem, Linux would only have one filesystem. The device mapper functionality is generic. We only have one VFS, we only need one mapping layer. What cool stuff people build on top of the mapping layer is another matter. If the mapping layer supports all of the requirements its done right, if not its borked and wants fixing first.