mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Luca Barbieri <ldb@ldb.ods.org>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Linux-Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] asm-generic/atomic.h and changes to arm, parisc, mips, m68k, sh, cris to use it
Date: 09 Aug 2002 01:11:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1028851871.28883.126.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1028846417.1669.95.camel@ldb>

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 23:40, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > The compiler can cache the value in a register
> It shouldn't since it is volatile and the machine has instructions with
> memory operands.

I'm curious what part of C99 guarantees that it must generate

	add 1 to memory

not

	load memory
	add 1
	store memory

It certainly guarantees not to cache it for use next statement, but does
it actually persuade the compiler to use direct operations on memory ?

I'm not a C99 language lawyer but genuinely curious


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-08 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-08 21:43 Luca Barbieri
2002-08-08 21:58 ` Roman Zippel
2002-08-08 22:11   ` Luca Barbieri
2002-08-08 22:27     ` Roman Zippel
2002-08-08 22:40       ` Luca Barbieri
2002-08-08 23:04         ` Roman Zippel
2002-08-09  0:11         ` Alan Cox [this message]
2002-08-08 23:09           ` Luca Barbieri
2002-08-09  3:52           ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-08 23:45     ` Alan Cox
2002-08-12 11:16     ` David Woodhouse
2002-08-12 12:03       ` Luca Barbieri
2002-08-08 23:29 ` Russell King
2002-08-09  0:41   ` [PATCH] [2.5] (v2) " Luca Barbieri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1028851871.28883.126.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ldb@ldb.ods.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®