From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6307C432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EF9206E6 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726949AbfKNF3w convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:29:52 -0500 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:34705 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725914AbfKNF3w (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:29:52 -0500 Received: from marcel-macpro.fritz.box (p4FF9F0D1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.249.240.209]) by mail.holtmann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E414CED05; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:38:56 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Support pcm params in dts From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:29:50 +0100 Cc: Johan Hedberg , Rob Herring , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , LKML Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <102CFB68-22A0-4DF7-B5CE-F3146AA36746@holtmann.org> References: <20191112230944.48716-1-abhishekpandit@chromium.org> <20191112230944.48716-4-abhishekpandit@chromium.org> To: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Abhishek, >>> BCM chips may require configuration of PCM to operate correctly and >>> there is a vendor specific HCI command to do this. Add support in the >>> hci_bcm driver to parse this from devicetree and configure the chip. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v4: None >>> Changes in v3: None >>> Changes in v2: None >>> >>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c >>> index 6134bff58748..4ee0b45be7e2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c >>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c >>> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ struct bcm_device_data { >>> * used to disable flow control during runtime suspend and system sleep >>> * @is_suspended: whether flow control is currently disabled >>> * @disallow_set_baudrate: don't allow set_baudrate >>> + * @has_pcm_params: whether PCM parameters need to be configured >>> + * @pcm_params: PCM and routing parameters >>> */ >>> struct bcm_device { >>> /* Must be the first member, hci_serdev.c expects this. */ >>> @@ -122,6 +124,9 @@ struct bcm_device { >>> bool is_suspended; >>> #endif >>> bool disallow_set_baudrate; >>> + >>> + bool has_pcm_params; >>> + struct bcm_set_pcm_int_params pcm_params; >>> }; >>> >>> /* generic bcm uart resources */ >>> @@ -596,6 +601,16 @@ static int bcm_setup(struct hci_uart *hu) >>> host_set_baudrate(hu, speed); >>> } >>> >>> + /* PCM parameters if any*/ >>> + if (bcm->dev && bcm->dev->has_pcm_params) { >>> + err = btbcm_set_pcm_int_params(hu->hdev, &bcm->dev->pcm_params); >>> + >>> + if (err) { >>> + bt_dev_info(hu->hdev, "BCM: Set pcm params failed (%d)", >>> + err); >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> finalize: >>> release_firmware(fw); >>> >>> @@ -1132,7 +1147,24 @@ static int bcm_acpi_probe(struct bcm_device *dev) >>> >>> static int bcm_of_probe(struct bcm_device *bdev) >>> { >>> + int err; >>> + >>> device_property_read_u32(bdev->dev, "max-speed", &bdev->oper_speed); >>> + >>> + err = device_property_read_u8(bdev->dev, "brcm,bt-sco-routing", >>> + &bdev->pcm_params.routing); >>> + if (!err) >>> + bdev->has_pcm_params = true; >> >> I think in case of HCI as routing path, these should be using the default or zero values as defined by Broadcom. > > I'm not sure what these default values should be. Wouldn't it be > reasonable to expect the user/developer to set the various brcm > parameters in device tree? > If unset, it's just 0. if that works with the hardware I am fine with that. The other option is to actually first read the current values. And then only change the ones that are supplied by the DT. Regards Marcel