From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 20:51:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 20:51:33 -0400 Received: from c16598.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.243.217]:34234 "HELO pc.kolivas.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 20:51:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1030150543.3d66d98f63c45@kolivas.net> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 10:55:43 +1000 From: conman@kolivas.net To: Kurt Johnson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: performance patch for 2.4.19 References: <20020823161337.81396.qmail@web14605.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020823161337.81396.qmail@web14605.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Kurt Johnson : > I was wondering, are considering mergint the -aa VM > patches in your performance patch for 2.4.19? IMHO, > lowish-end machines (desktop machines and smaller > boxes) have notorious gains with -aa VM compared to > Rik's -rmap, so it'd be interesting to see how a combo > of O(1)+preempt+low_lat+aa would perform. Just a > thought, tho. Thanks for your work integrating all the > patches, it sure helps a lot! My pleasure. I might try a -rmap and -aa extension.