mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
To: mingo@elte.hu, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: pid_max hang again...
Date: 06 Sep 2002 08:52:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1031320378.24570.44.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com> (raw)

In the nightly bk pull testing I do, I saw that this got commited
yesterday:

-ChangeSet@1.619, 2002-09-05 08:45:49-07:00, mingo@elte.hu
-  [PATCH] pid-max-2.5.33-A0
-  
-  This is the pid-max patch, the one i sent for 2.5.31 was botched.  I
-  have removed the 'once' debugging stupidity - now PIDs start at 0
-  again.
-  Also, for an unknown reason the previous patch missed the hunk that 
-  had the declaration of 'DEFAULT_PID_MAX' which made it not compile

It looks like this change dropped us back to the same error all this was
originally supposed to fix.  When you hit PID_MAX, get_pid() starts
looping forever looking for a free pid and hangs.  I could probably make
my original fix work on this very easily if you'd like.

I wonder though, would it be possible to do this in a more simple way by
just throttling max_threads back to something more sane if it gets
defaulted too high?  Since it gets checked before we even get to the
get_pid call in copy_process().  That would keep the number of processes
down to a sane level without the risk.

Thanks,
Paul Larson
http://www.linuxtestproject.org


             reply	other threads:[~2002-09-06 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-06 13:52 Paul Larson [this message]
2002-09-06 15:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-06 15:47   ` Paul Larson
2002-09-06 17:43   ` [PATCH] " Paul Larson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1031320378.24570.44.camel@plars.austin.ibm.com \
    --to=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®