From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36-mm1
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:07:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032386838.3d88f9165a323@kolivas.net> (raw)
Here are the results with contest 0.34
NoLoad:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 68.14 99%
2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99%
2.5.34 69.88 99%
2.5.36 69.58 99%
2.5.36-mm1 69.93 99%
Process Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 81.10 80%
2.4.20-pre7 81.92 80%
2.5.34 71.39 94%
2.5.36 71.80 94%
2.5.36-mm1 71.48 94%
Mem Load:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 92.49 77%
2.4.20-pre7 92.25 77%
2.5.34 138.05 54%
2.5.36 132.45 56%
2.5.36-mm1 104.57 71%
IO Half Mem:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 99.41 70%
2.4.20-pre7 99.42 71%
2.5.34 74.31 93%
2.5.36 94.82 76%
2.5.36-mm1 85.63 85%
IO Full Mem:
Kernel Time CPU
2.4.19 173.00 41%
2.4.20-pre7 146.38 48%
2.5.34 74.00 94%
2.5.36 87.57 81%
2.5.36-mm1 262.07 27%
Log of 2.5.36:
noload Time: 69.58 CPU: 99% Major Faults: 242825 Minor Faults: 292307
process_load Time: 71.80 CPU: 94% Major Faults: 205009 Minor Faults: 256150
io_halfmem Time: 94.82 CPU: 76% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255214
Was writing number 6 of a 112Mb sized io_load file after 104 seconds
io_fullmem Time: 87.57 CPU: 81% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255312
Was writing number 3 of a 224Mb sized io_load file after 119 seconds
mem_load Time: 132.45 CPU: 56% Major Faults: 204115 Minor Faults: 255234
Log of 2.5.36-mm1:
noload Time: 69.93 CPU: 99% Major Faults: 250349 Minor Faults: 299716
process_load Time: 71.48 CPU: 94% Major Faults: 205306 Minor Faults: 256259
io_halfmem Time: 85.63 CPU: 85% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255206
Was writing number 6 of a 112Mb sized io_load file after 93 seconds
io_fullmem Time: 262.07 CPU: 27% Major Faults: 204019 Minor Faults: 255213
Was writing number 11 of a 224Mb sized io_load file after 279 seconds
mem_load Time: 104.57 CPU: 71% Major Faults: 204093 Minor Faults: 255564
Test Machine:
1133Mhz PIII with 224 Mb Ram, single hard disk 5400rpm ATA5.
Big difference in both mem_load and IO load. Note the much larger number of
writes from IO_fullmem load, compared with a smaller number for IO_halfmem ?
http://contest.kolivas.net
Comments?
Con.
reply other threads:[~2002-09-18 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1032386838.3d88f9165a323@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®