From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:16:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:16:45 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust128.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.128]:24824 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:16:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module rewrite 6/20: streq From: Alan Cox To: Rusty Russell Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020925032201.A38102C12D@lists.samba.org> References: <20020925032201.A38102C12D@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 26 Sep 2002 14:26:55 +0100 Message-Id: <1033046815.1348.6.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 04:01, Rusty Russell wrote: > Name: streq implementation > Author: Rusty Russell > Status: Trivial > Depends: Misc/strcspn.patch.gz > > D: I can't believe that after all these years I still make the "sense > D: of strcmp" mistake. So it's time to reintroduce my favorite macro. So you replace something all the competent programmers understand with some weird Rusty specific macro that just makes it harder still for other people to follow kernel code. Why ?