From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:29:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:29:17 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:33440 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:29:16 -0400 Subject: Re: Input - Only try to enable extra keys if user requested it [2/3] From: Alan Cox To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021009130123.B367@ucw.cz> References: <20021009101256.A10748@ucw.cz> <20021009130035.A367@ucw.cz> <20021009130123.B367@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 09 Oct 2002 12:45:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1034163931.1323.3.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 12:01, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > Don't try to enable extra keys on IBM/Chicony keyboards as this upsets > several notebook keyboards. Until we find a better solution how to detect > who are we talking to, we rely on the kernel command line. Use > atkbd_set=4 to gain access to the extra keys. Surely this also wants a runtime option, or do you assume its fixable somehow ?