On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 22:54, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 22:27, David Mansfield wrote:
> >
> > -               sector_t x = block;
> > +               volatile sector_t y = 0;
> > +               sector_t x = block - y;
> >                 sector_div(x, (unsigned long)conf->smallest->size);
> >                 hash = conf->hash_table + x;
> >         }
> this appears to be a bad code bug; do_div() requires the first argument
> to be an u64 and we cast it to unsigned long here....

ehm ignore me I'm blind