From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:25:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:25:42 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:15505 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:25:41 -0400 Subject: Re: feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer? From: "David S. Miller" To: Matti Aarnio Cc: Slavcho Nikolov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20021022211535.GZ1111@mea-ext.zmailer.org> References: <00b201c27a0e$3f82c220$800a140a@SLNW2K> <20021022211535.GZ1111@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 22 Oct 2002 15:42:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1035326559.16085.18.camel@rth.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 14:15, Matti Aarnio wrote: > ftp://zmailer.org/linux/netif_rx.patch Please EXPORT_GPL this, if you are going to do it at all. Only non-GPL compliant binary-modules can result from this change. People can easily do things like implement their own entire networking stack with this hook, which is not what we want nor is it allowed.