From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:01:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:01:55 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:53153 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:01:54 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.5.xx kernel performance issue... From: "David S. Miller" To: "Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S." Cc: "'Linux-Kernel'" In-Reply-To: <000a01c27c28$0baa6e50$6009720a@wipro.com> References: <000a01c27c28$0baa6e50$6009720a@wipro.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 25 Oct 2002 10:20:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1035566442.19155.8.camel@rth.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 06:11, Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S. wrote: > TCP and AF_UNIX socket stream bandwidth has also got drastic change. There is debugging code enabled for the loopback interface in 2.5.x to test out some new features in the networking stack. Once that debugging code is removed (say in 2.6.0) these performance drops will drop. I have to post this every time someone complains about lmbench performance loss in 2.5.x